Let FF be a and GG a connected . An automorphic form on GG is a complex-valued function on

G(F)\G(AF)G(F)\backslash G(\mathbb A_F)

where AF\mathbb A_F is the , and that is smooth, of moderate growth, right at the archimedean places, right fixed by some compact open subgroup at the finite places, and finite under the center of the archimedean universal . A may be prescribed.

Why the finiteness conditions appear

At a finite place, smoothness means local constancy, so a single automorphic form is fixed by a sufficiently small compact open subgroup. At an archimedean place, compact finiteness and infinitesimal-character finiteness place the function in the algebraic representation-theoretic category of (g,K)(\mathfrak g,K)-modules. Moderate growth controls its behavior on the noncompact quotient.

Some authors build uniform moderate growth into the definition, while others obtain it from the remaining conditions in their chosen setting. The precise space should therefore be named when analytic estimates matter.

Central and split-center conventions

If ω\omega is a character of ZG(F)\ZG(AF)Z_G(F)\backslash Z_G(\mathbb A_F), one usually imposes

f(zg)=ω(z)f(g).f(zg)=\omega(z)f(g).

Square-integrability, with the quotient measure compatibly normalized (often from ), is then measured either modulo the center or on the kernel G(AF)1G(\mathbb A_F)^1 of all adelic absolute-value characters. These equivalent-looking presentations encode a real convention and should not be silently interchanged.

Constant terms

For a P=MNP=MN, with MM and NN, the of ff along PP is

fP(g)=N(F)\N(AF)f(ng)dn.f_P(g)= \int_{N(F)\backslash N(\mathbb A_F)} f(ng)\,dn.

Its vanishing for every proper parabolic defines a automorphic form. Nonzero constant terms lead to and the or spectrum.

From forms to representations

by G(AF)G(\mathbb A_F) acts on automorphic forms. Irreducible subquotients of this action are . Thus a form is a vector, not an ; Hecke eigenforms often generate automorphic representations.

References
  1. A. Borel and H. Jacquet, “Automorphic forms and automorphic representations,” in Automorphic Forms, Representations and LL-Functions, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 33, part 1, 1979, pp. 189–207.
  2. Jayce Getz and Heekyoung Hahn, An Introduction to Automorphic Representations, Springer, 2024. DOI.