Definition

Let GG be a second-countable , (X,μ)(X,\mu) a standard σ\sigma-finite , and (Hx)xX(H_x)_{x\in X} a . Suppose πx\pi_x is a of GG on HxH_x, and the action field (x,g)πx(g)(x,g)\mapsto\pi_x(g) is measurable. The direct integral representation

π=Xπxdμ(x)\pi=\int_X^\oplus\pi_x\,d\mu(x)

acts on the by (π(g)ξ)x=πx(g)ξx(\pi(g)\xi)_x=\pi_x(g)\xi_x . Equalities and changes of fibers are understood modulo μ\mu-null sets.

Fiberwise integrated form

For fCc(G)f\in C_c(G), the is decomposable:

π(f)=Xπx(f)dμ(x).\pi(f)=\int_X^\oplus\pi_x(f)\,d\mu(x).

Thus operator-algebraic questions about π(f)\pi(f) can often be reduced to almost-everywhere questions about the fibers. This relation also transports direct-integral decompositions between and representations of the Folland, §7.4.

Decomposition and multiplicity

For suitable separable type I groups, a unitary representation decomposes over the into irreducible fibers with a measurable multiplicity function. The then yields the nonabelian . Outside the type I setting, irreducible decompositions can have severe nonuniqueness, so direct integrals are often taken instead over factor representations Dixmier, §18.7.

Conventions and scope

“Continuous direct sum” is suggestive but does not mean that xHxx\mapsto H_x or xπxx\mapsto\pi_x is continuous in an ordinary bundle topology; measurability is the defining regularity. A direct sum is the special case of counting measure. The phrase “disintegration” may refer either to constructing this representation from fibers or to a theorem asserting that a given representation admits such a decomposition.

References
  1. Gerald B. Folland, A Course in Abstract Harmonic Analysis, 2nd ed., CRC Press, 2016. DOI record. Relevant: §7.4 on direct-integral decompositions of representations.
  2. Jacques Dixmier, CC^*-Algebras, North-Holland, 1977. Publisher record. Relevant: §§8.5 and 18.7 on measurable fields and disintegration.