Let GG be a second-countable , (X,μ)(X,\mu) a standard σ\sigma-finite , and (Hx)xX(H_x)_{x\in X} a . Suppose πx\pi_x is a of GG on HxH_x, and the action field (x,g)πx(g)(x,g)\mapsto\pi_x(g) is measurable. The direct integral representation

π=Xπxdμ(x)\pi=\int_X^\oplus\pi_x\,d\mu(x)

acts on the by (π(g)ξ)x=πx(g)ξx(\pi(g)\xi)_x=\pi_x(g)\xi_x . Equalities and changes of fibers are understood modulo μ\mu-null sets.

Fiberwise integrated form

For fCc(G)f\in C_c(G), the is decomposable:

π(f)=Xπx(f)dμ(x).\pi(f)=\int_X^\oplus\pi_x(f)\,d\mu(x).

Thus operator-algebraic questions about π(f)\pi(f) can often be reduced to almost-everywhere questions about the fibers. This relation also transports direct-integral decompositions between and representations of the .

Decomposition and multiplicity

For suitable separable type I groups, a unitary representation decomposes over the into irreducible fibers with a measurable multiplicity function. The then yields the nonabelian . Outside the type I setting, irreducible decompositions can have severe nonuniqueness, so direct integrals are often taken instead over factor representations.

Conventions and scope

“Continuous direct sum” is suggestive but does not mean that xHxx\mapsto H_x or xπxx\mapsto\pi_x is continuous in an ordinary bundle topology; measurability is the defining regularity. A direct sum is the special case of counting measure. The phrase “disintegration” may refer either to constructing this representation from fibers or to a theorem asserting that a given representation admits such a decomposition.

References
  1. Gerald B. Folland, A Course in Abstract Harmonic Analysis, 2nd ed., CRC Press, 2016. DOI record. Relevant: §7.4 on direct-integral decompositions of representations.
  2. Jacques Dixmier, CC^*-Algebras, North-Holland, 1977. Publisher record. Relevant: §§8.5 and 18.7 on measurable fields and disintegration.