Definition

Let FF be a and let G(F)G(F) be a local group. Its test-function space is denoted

D(G(F))=Cc(G(F)).\mathcal D(G(F))=C_c^\infty(G(F)).

The superscript has two different, category-dependent meanings:

  • if FF is archimedean and G(F)G(F) is a , it consists of smooth complex functions with compact support;
  • if FF is nonarchimedean and G(F)G(F) is , it consists of locally constant complex functions with compact support.

In both cases D(G(F))\mathcal D(G(F)) carries its standard locally convex inductive-limit topology. This topology, not only the underlying vector space, determines what it means for a to be continuous.

Nonarchimedean description

A nonarchimedean test function is fixed by translation by some compact open subgroup on each chosen side. Spaces with fixed compact support and fixed open invariance are finite-dimensional, and their directed union gives Cc(G(F))C_c^\infty(G(F)). The notation “smooth” therefore means locally constant; it does not refer to derivatives.

For a compact open subgroup KK, the bi-KK-invariant test functions form the H(G(F),K)\mathcal H(G(F),K). Allowing KK to shrink recovers the full test-function space.

Convolution and measures

After choosing a , test functions can be convolved. Changing the Haar measure rescales formulas that identify functions with measures, so trace formulas, , and character distributions must state compatible measure normalizations.

Adelic form

For an over a global field, the adelic test-function space is a restricted tensor product of the local spaces. At almost every finite place where the group is unramified, one fixes a hyperspecial subgroup KvK_v and uses the distinguished function 1Kv1_{K_v}. This is the group analogue of the .

Scope warning

The D(Ω)\mathcal D(\Omega) is the archimedean open-set model, not a definition of locally constant pp-adic test functions. An arbitrary that is neither a Lie group nor locally profinite has no canonical CcC_c^\infty until an additional or test-function category is specified.

References
  1. François Bruhat, “Distributions sur un groupe localement compact et applications à l'étude des représentations des groupes pp-adiques,” Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France 89 (1961), 43–75. Numdam.
  2. James Arthur, “An introduction to the trace formula,” in Harmonic Analysis, the Trace Formula, and Shimura Varieties, Clay Mathematics Proceedings 4, 2005, §§1–3. Clay.