Let KK be a locally compact nondiscrete field. The Schwartz–Bruhat space S(K)\mathcal S(K) is defined according to the type of KK. If KRK\cong\mathbb R or C\mathbb C, then S(K)\mathcal S(K) is the usual : its smooth functions and all their derivatives decay faster than every polynomial. If KK is nonarchimedean, then

S(K)=Cc(K),\mathcal S(K)=C_c^\infty(K),

the complex-valued, locally constant, compactly supported functions on the additive group of KK. Equivalently, each such function is constant on cosets of some open fractional ideal and vanishes outside a . This is the local-field specialization of the .

Fourier stability

Choose a nontrivial continuous additive character ψ:KT\psi:K\to\mathbb T and a on the additive group of KK. The Fourier transform

f^(y)=Kf(x)ψ(xy)dx\widehat f(y)=\int_K f(x)\overline{\psi(xy)}\,dx

maps S(K)\mathcal S(K) onto itself. With the self-dual normalization of Haar measure it satisfies the usual Fourier inversion formula. This common formalism lets archimedean and nonarchimedean local factors be treated in parallel.

Basic nonarchimedean examples

If OK\mathcal O_K is the valuation ring, then its indicator 1OK1_{\mathcal O_K} lies in S(K)\mathcal S(K): the ring is compact and open, so its indicator is both compactly supported and locally constant. A continuous compactly supported function need not belong to S(K)\mathcal S(K); local constancy is a defining requirement.

Conventions and scope

The notation Cc(K)C_c^\infty(K) in the nonarchimedean case does not refer to derivatives. “Smooth” there means locally constant, equivalently smooth for the action of the totally disconnected additive group. For K=CK=\mathbb C, rapid decay is measured on the underlying real R2\mathbb R^2.

References
  1. André Weil, Basic Number Theory, 3rd ed., Springer, 1974. DOI record. Relevant: “Lattices and duality over local fields,” pp. 24–42.
  2. François Bruhat, “Distributions sur un groupe localement compact et applications à l’étude des représentations des groupes pp-adiques,” Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France 89 (1961), 43–75. DOI record. Relevant: pp. 60–61 on the general Schwartz–Bruhat construction.