Definition

Let MM be a compact smooth , let F{R,C}\mathbb F\in\{\mathbb R,\mathbb C\}, and let EME\to M be a smooth finite-rank F\mathbb F-. The finite-projectivity theorem for the section module states that the Γ(M,E)\Gamma^\infty(M,E) is a finitely generated over . Equivalently, there are an integer NN, another C(M,F)C^\infty(M,\mathbb F)-module QQ, and an isomorphism

Γ(M,E)QC(M,F)N.\Gamma^\infty(M,E)\oplus Q\cong C^\infty(M,\mathbb F)^N.

Compactness guarantees the finite global construction used below.

Proof by a complementary bundle

A finite trivializing cover and a subordinate smooth partition of unity produce finitely many that span every fiber. They define a surjective

M×FNE.M\times\mathbb F^N\longrightarrow E.

After choosing a , its kernel is a smooth and the maps isomorphically onto EE. Thus there is a vector bundle FF with

EFM×FN.E\oplus F\cong M\times\mathbb F^N.

Taking smooth sections gives

Γ(E)Γ(F)C(M,F)N,\Gamma(E)\oplus\Gamma(F)\cong C^\infty(M,\mathbb F)^N,

which proves both projectivity and finite generation Nestruev, Chapter 11.

Idempotent form

The splitting determines a smooth idempotent matrix

pMN(C(M,F)),p2=p,p\in M_N(C^\infty(M,\mathbb F)), \qquad p^2=p,

such that

Γ(M,E)pC(M,F)N.\Gamma^\infty(M,E)\cong p\,C^\infty(M,\mathbb F)^N.

Conversely, the pointwise images of such an idempotent form a smooth bundle; this is the . The theorem in the core is therefore one direction of the smooth Serre–Swan equivalence.

Examples and scope

For the trivial rank-rr bundle, Γ(M,M×Fr)C(M,F)r\Gamma^\infty(M,M\times\mathbb F^r)\cong C^\infty(M,\mathbb F)^r, which is free. The Möbius over S1S^1 gives a projective module that is not free: projectivity records the existence of a complementary bundle, whereas freeness would give a global frame and trivialize the bundle Nestruev, Chapter 11.

The compact hypothesis makes the finite-cover proof immediate. Extensions to noncompact finite-dimensional manifolds use finite-covering-dimension or bundle-embedding results instead. If one replaces C(M)C^\infty(M) by functions vanishing at infinity, the appropriate section module and projectivity statement must also be changed; this is a different Serre–Swan formulation Nestruev, Chapter 11.

References
  1. Richard G. Swan, “Vector Bundles and Projective Modules,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 105 (1962), 264–277. DOI record. Relevant: Theorem 1 and the compact-Hausdorff continuous model for section modules as finite projective modules.
  2. Jet Nestruev, Smooth Manifolds and Observables, Springer, 2003. DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 11, “Vector Bundles and Projective Modules.”