Definition

Let MM be a , let F=R\mathbb F=\mathbb R or C\mathbb C, and let

pMn ⁣(C(M,F))satisfyp2=p.p\in M_n\!\left(C^\infty(M,\mathbb F)\right) \qquad\text{satisfy}\qquad p^2=p.

Here C(M,F)C^\infty(M,\mathbb F) is the . The defined by pp is

Ep:={(x,v)M×Fn:p(x)v=v}=xMimp(x).E_p := \{(x,v)\in M\times\mathbb F^n:p(x)v=v\} = \coprod_{x\in M}\operatorname{im}p(x).

Because a smooth has locally constant rank, these images form a smooth of the trivial bundle. Its complementary subbundle is E1pE_{1-p}, and EpE1p=M×FnE_p\oplus E_{1-p}=M\times\mathbb F^n.

Sections and projective modules

A of EpE_p is precisely a smooth function s:MFns:M\to\mathbb F^n satisfying ps=sps=s. Hence

Γ(Ep)pC(M,F)n.\Gamma(E_p)\cong p\,C^\infty(M,\mathbb F)^n.

This module is a direct summand of the C(M,F)nC^\infty(M,\mathbb F)^n, so it is a finitely generated . Conversely, every finitely generated projective module is the image of an idempotent endomorphism of a finite free module. This is the concrete reconstruction step in the Serre–Swan correspondence; compare Swan, §§1–3.

Geometry of the construction

The kernel of p(x)p(x) equals the image of 1p(x)1-p(x), giving a smooth complement even when pp is not self-adjoint. If pp is self-adjoint for the standard , then p(x)p(x) is the onto Ep,xE_{p,x}.

For M=SmRm+1M=S^m\subset\mathbb R^{m+1}, the matrix

p(x)=IxxTp(x)=I-xx^{\mathsf T}

is a smooth self-adjoint idempotent whose image is TxSmT_xS^m. Thus the of a sphere appears directly as an .

Scope and near-misses

The construction itself works on any smooth manifold. The familiar equivalence between smooth vector bundles and finitely generated projective C(M)C^\infty(M)-modules is most often stated for compact MM; noncompact variants require care about finite generation and the chosen function algebra.

A smooth matrix with varying rank does not define a vector bundle by taking images. For example, q(x)=[x]q(x)=[x] on R\mathbb R has jumping image dimension at 00, and it fails the decisive axiom q2=qq^2=q. The term “projector” here means idempotent, not necessarily orthogonal.

References
  1. Richard G. Swan, “Vector Bundles and Projective Modules,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 105 (1962), 264–277. DOI record. Relevant: §§1–3, section modules and the vector-bundle/projective-module correspondence.
  2. Max Karoubi, K-Theory: An Introduction, Springer, 1978. DOI record. Relevant: Chapter I, vector bundles, projective modules, and idempotents.