Let F{R,C}\mathbb F\in\{\mathbb R,\mathbb C\}, and let EME\to M be a smooth F\mathbb F- over a . The module of smooth sections is

Γ(M,E)={s:MEs is a smooth section of E}.\Gamma^\infty(M,E)=\{s:M\to E\mid s\text{ is a smooth section of }E\}.

For s,tΓ(M,E)s,t\in\Gamma^\infty(M,E) and fC(M,F)f\in C^\infty(M,\mathbb F), its operations are defined fiberwise by

(s+t)(x)=s(x)+t(x),(fs)(x)=f(x)s(x).(s+t)(x)=s(x)+t(x), \qquad (fs)(x)=f(x)s(x).

These operations make Γ(M,E)\Gamma^\infty(M,E) a module over the commutative . This module is also written Γ(E)\Gamma(E) when smoothness, the scalar field, and the base are understood.

Local structure

Over a trivializing open set UU, a local frame identifies

Γ(U,EU)C(U,F)r.\Gamma^\infty(U,E|_U)\cong C^\infty(U,\mathbb F)^r.

More precisely, these modules over varying open sets form the , which is locally free of rank r=rankEr=\operatorname{rank}E over CM(,F)C^\infty_M(-,\mathbb F). The single global module Γ(M,E)\Gamma^\infty(M,E) is not itself what “locally free” refers to. Globally it need not possess a basis: a global module basis would be a global frame and would trivialize EE.

Evaluation at xx gives a surjective Γ(M,E)Ex\Gamma^\infty(M,E)\to E_x. Its kernel consists of sections vanishing at xx, and the fiber can be recovered algebraically as

ExΓ(M,E)/mxΓ(M,E),E_x\cong \Gamma^\infty(M,E)/\mathfrak m_x\Gamma^\infty(M,E),

where mx\mathfrak m_x is the ideal of smooth functions vanishing at xx.

Functoriality

A smooth F\mathbb F-linear Φ:EE\Phi:E\to E' over the identity of MM induces a C(M,F)C^\infty(M,\mathbb F)-linear map

Γ(Φ):Γ(M,E)Γ(M,E),sΦs.\Gamma(\Phi):\Gamma^\infty(M,E)\to\Gamma^\infty(M,E'), \qquad s\mapsto\Phi\circ s.

Conversely, C(M,F)C^\infty(M,\mathbb F)-linear maps between section modules arise from unique smooth F\mathbb F-linear under the standard finite-rank hypotheses. This correspondence is one part of the smooth Serre–Swan viewpoint.

The requirement that Φ\Phi cover idM\operatorname{id}_M is essential: it places EE and FF in the same and makes both section spaces modules over the same ring. A morphism covering f:MNf:M\to N does not give the displayed map by postcomposition.

Relation to Serre–Swan

If MM is a connected finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable manifold and EE has finite rank, then Γ(M,E)\Gamma^\infty(M,E) is a finitely generated over C(M,F)C^\infty(M,\mathbb F), and every such module is the section module of a smooth F\mathbb F-vector bundle. This smooth Serre–Swan statement requires no compactness hypothesis; finite dimensionality supplies a finite-rank complementary bundle. On a disconnected base, one requires the ranks on components to be globally bounded. The original compact Hausdorff theorem over C(X)C(X) is a distinct continuous formulation.

Taking sections over every open set gives the .

References
  1. R. G. Swan, “Vector Bundles and Projective Modules,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 105 (1962), 264–277. DOI record. Relevant: Theorem 1 and the compact-Hausdorff equivalence.
  2. J. Nestruev, Smooth Manifolds and Observables, Springer, 2003. DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 11, vector bundles and projective modules over smooth-function algebras.
  3. L. W. Tu, Differential Geometry: Connections, Curvature, and Characteristic Classes, Springer, 2017. DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 1, smooth vector bundles and section modules.