Definition

Two AA and BB are strongly Morita equivalent when there exists an XX. Concretely, XX is a full right Hilbert BB-module with a nondegenerate *-homomorphism

ALB(X)A\longrightarrow\mathcal L_B(X)

whose image is exactly KB(X)\mathcal K_B(X), the CC^*-algebra of compact adjointable operators on XX. Equivalently, XX carries compatible full AA- and BB-valued inner products satisfying

Ax,yz=xy,zB.{}_A\langle x,y\rangle z=x\langle y,z\rangle_B.

The existence of such an XX, not a chosen algebra isomorphism, is the defining equivalence.

Equivalence relation and representations

Strong Morita equivalence is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. The conjugate bimodule reverses an equivalence, while the composes two of them. through XX gives an equivalence between the categories of AA and BB Rieffel, induced representations.

Ideals, primitive spectra, and many structural properties correspond under this equivalence. In particular, type I and continuous-trace behavior are Morita invariant.

Examples and non-examples

For any HH, the module HH is a K(H)\mathcal K(H)-C\mathbb C imprimitivity bimodule, so K(H)\mathcal K(H) is strongly Morita equivalent to C\mathbb C. More generally, Mn(A)M_n(A) is strongly Morita equivalent to AA.

Morita equivalence is weaker than *-isomorphism: K(H)\mathcal K(H) and C\mathbb C are not isomorphic when HH is infinite-dimensional. A general CC^*-correspondence is a near miss; without fullness and the identification of the left action with , it need not implement an equivalence.

References
  1. M. A. Rieffel, “Induced Representations of CC^*-Algebras,” Advances in Mathematics 13 (1974), 176–257. DOI record. Relevant: imprimitivity bimodules, induction, and equivalence of representation theories.
  2. I. Raeburn and D. P. Williams, Morita Equivalence and Continuous-Trace CC^*-Algebras, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 60, American Mathematical Society, 1998. DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 3 on imprimitivity bimodules and strong Morita equivalence.