Let AA and BB be C∗C^*-algebras. An AA-BB imprimitivity bimodule is a AEB{}_AE_B, hence an , such that the closed span of ⟨E,E⟩B\langle E,E\rangle_B is BB and the left action is a ∗*-isomorphism

A⟶KB(E).A\longrightarrow \mathcal K_B(E).

The first condition is right fullness; the second makes the left action faithful, nondegenerate, and exactly the . Existence of such an EE means that AA and BB are strongly Morita equivalent.

Two-inner-product formulation

For ξ,η∈E\xi,\eta\in E, define the left AA-valued inner product by requiring that A⟨ξ,η⟩{}_A\langle\xi,\eta\rangle act as the rank-one operator θξ,η\theta_{\xi,\eta}. Then

A⟨ξ,η⟩ζ=ξ⟨η,ζ⟩B.{}_A\langle\xi,\eta\rangle\zeta =\xi\langle\eta,\zeta\rangle_B.

The two inner products are full and induce the same norm. Conversely, a full left and right Hilbert bimodule satisfying this compatibility identity gives the compact-operator formulation above.

Standard examples

Every C∗C^*-algebra AA is an AA-AA imprimitivity bimodule with A⟨x,y⟩=xy∗{}_A\langle x,y\rangle=xy^* and ⟨x,y⟩A=x∗y\langle x,y\rangle_A=x^*y. More generally, any full right Hilbert BB-module EE is a KB(E)\mathcal K_B(E)-BB imprimitivity bimodule. give the special case K(H)∼MC\mathcal K(H)\sim_M\mathbb C.

Distinction from a correspondence

An arbitrary correspondence may have a nonfaithful left action, may fail to be full on the right, or may act by adjointable operators outside KB(E)\mathcal K_B(E). Any of these failures prevents it from being an imprimitivity bimodule. Thus “Hilbert C∗C^*-bimodule” is potentially ambiguous unless fullness and the compatibility condition are stated.

References
  1. Marc A. Rieffel, “Induced representations of C-algebras,” Advances in Mathematics* 13 (1974), 176–257. DOI record. Relevant: §§2–6 on rigged modules, imprimitivity, and induced representations.
  2. Iain Raeburn and Dana P. Williams, Morita Equivalence and Continuous-Trace C-Algebras*, American Mathematical Society, 1998. AMS DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 3 on imprimitivity bimodules.