Definition

Let EE be a from AA to BB, with left action φ:ALB(E)\varphi:A\to\mathcal L_B(E), and let π:BB(Hπ)\pi:B\to\mathcal B(H_\pi) be a . Rieffel induction through EE is the representation of AA on the EπHπE\otimes_\pi H_\pi defined by

IndE(π)(a)(ξh)=(φ(a)ξ)h.\operatorname{Ind}_E(\pi)(a)(\xi\otimes h) =(\varphi(a)\xi)\otimes h.

Here EπHπE\otimes_\pi H_\pi is obtained by balancing ξbh=ξπ(b)h\xi b\otimes h=\xi\otimes\pi(b)h, quotienting the null space of its induced , and completing. Adjointability of φ(a)\varphi(a) makes the formula well defined and bounded.

Action on intertwiners

If T:HπHρT:H_\pi\to H_\rho intertwines two representations of BB, then

1ET:EπHπEρHρ1_E\otimes T:E\otimes_\pi H_\pi\longrightarrow E\otimes_\rho H_\rho

intertwines their . Induction therefore acts functorially on categories and preserves unitary equivalence. Tensor-product associativity identifies induction through a composite correspondence with successive induction.

Imprimitivity theorem

When EE is an , Rieffel induction is an equivalence between the categories of nondegenerate representations of BB and AA. Induction through the conjugate bimodule E~\widetilde E is a quasi-inverse. Consequently, strong Morita equivalence preserves the representation-theoretic structure encoded by ideals and Rieffel, §§5–6.

Examples and scope

For the identity BB-BB correspondence E=BE=B, the map bhπ(b)hb\otimes h\mapsto\pi(b)h identifies IndB(π)\operatorname{Ind}_B(\pi) with π\pi. For a full Hilbert BB-module EE, induction implements the equivalence between BB and KB(E)\mathcal K_B(E).

References
  1. Marc A. Rieffel, “Induced representations of C-algebras,” Advances in Mathematics* 13 (1974), 176–257. DOI record. Relevant: §§2–6 on Hilbert modules, induction, and the imprimitivity theorem.
  2. Iain Raeburn and Dana P. Williams, Morita Equivalence and Continuous-Trace C-Algebras*, American Mathematical Society, 1998. AMS DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 3 on induced representations and Morita equivalence.