Definition

Let (A,G,α)(A,G,\alpha) be a and let π:AB(H)\pi:A\to\mathcal B(H) be a . The regular covariant representation induced by π\pi acts on L2(G,H)L^2(G,H) by

(π~(a)ξ)(s)=π(αs1(a))ξ(s),(λtξ)(s)=ξ(t1s).(\widetilde\pi(a)\xi)(s)=\pi(\alpha_{s^{-1}}(a))\xi(s), \qquad (\lambda_t\xi)(s)=\xi(t^{-1}s).

Here L2(G,H)L^2(G,H) uses a left , and λ\lambda is the . The pair (π~,λ)(\widetilde\pi,\lambda) is covariant because

π~(αt(a))=λtπ~(a)λt.\widetilde\pi(\alpha_t(a))=\lambda_t\widetilde\pi(a)\lambda_t^*.

Both representations are nondegenerate, and λ\lambda is strongly continuous. Their integrated form is consequently a nondegenerate representation of the crossed-product convolution algebra; when π\pi is faithful, its operator norm defines the reduced crossed-product norm.

Integrated regular representation

Its is

((π~λ)(f)ξ)(s)=Gπ(αs1(f(t)))ξ(t1s)dt.((\widetilde\pi\rtimes\lambda)(f)\xi)(s) =\int_G\pi(\alpha_{s^{-1}}(f(t)))\xi(t^{-1}s)\,dt.

The of this representation supplies the reduced crossed-product norm. Thus “regular” refers to the use of translation on the group variable, not to a regularity condition on vectors or coefficients.

Dependence on the coefficient representation

If π\pi is faithful and nondegenerate, the resulting reduced norm and are independent of π\pi up to canonical isomorphism Williams, §7.2, Definition 7.7. Faithfulness matters: starting from a representation with nonzero kernel can discard coefficient-algebra information and produce a smaller image.

The construction can also be viewed as inducing π\pi from the identity subgroup. This perspective explains the common notation Indπ\operatorname{Ind}\pi for the integrated .

Standard cases

When A=CA=\mathbb C with the trivial action and π\pi is the scalar representation, π~\widetilde\pi acts by scalars and the integrated form is the usual regular representation of Cc(G)C_c(G). For a discrete GG, L2(G,H)=2(G,H)L^2(G,H)=\ell^2(G,H), and the formulas become pointwise coefficient action together with shifts of the GG-coordinate.

References
  1. Dana P. Williams, Crossed Products of CC^*-Algebras, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 134, American Mathematical Society, 2007. DOI record. Relevant: §2.2, Example 2.14 on regular covariant representations, and §7.2 on reduced crossed products.