Definition

Let (A,G,α)(A,G,\alpha) be a . A covariant representation of (A,G,α)(A,G,\alpha) on a HH is a pair (π,U)(\pi,U) in which π:AB(H)\pi:A\to\mathcal B(H) is a , U:GU(H)U:G\to\mathcal U(H) is a , and

π(αs(a))=Usπ(a)Us\pi(\alpha_s(a))=U_s\pi(a)U_s^*

for every sGs\in G and aAa\in A. The displayed covariance identity is the compatibility axiom relating the algebra representation to the .

Integrated compatibility

The covariance identity is precisely what makes

fGπ(f(s))Usdsf\longmapsto\int_G\pi(f(s))U_s\,ds

a *-representation of the . Completion then turns covariant pairs into nondegenerate representations of the . This correspondence is the universal role of covariant representations Williams, §§2.2–2.4.

Examples and non-examples

For the trivial action of GG on AA, covariance says that every UsU_s commutes with π(A)\pi(A). The one-dimensional pair (idC,U)(\operatorname{id}_{\mathbb C},U) is covariant for the trivial action on C\mathbb C for any UU.

A representation π\pi and a unitary representation UU on the same Hilbert space do not form a covariant pair merely by coexisting: if conjugation by UsU_s fails to implement αs\alpha_s through π\pi, the covariance axiom fails.

Conventions and scope

Some treatments permit degenerate π\pi, but the standard crossed-product representation correspondence uses nondegenerate representations. The phrase “covariant representation” is setting-dependent: representations of correspondences, operator systems, and dynamical systems have different covariance relations. Here it always refers to the displayed CC^*-dynamical-system identity.

References
  1. Dana P. Williams, Crossed Products of CC^*-Algebras, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 134, American Mathematical Society, 2007. DOI record. Relevant: §2.2 on covariant representations and §2.3 on integrated forms.
  2. Gert K. Pedersen, CC^*-Algebras and Their Automorphism Groups, 2nd ed., Academic Press, 2018. DOI record. Relevant: §7.6 on covariant representations.