Definition

Let AA be a complex . Its opposite algebra AopA^{\mathrm{op}} has the same complex , norm, and involution as AA, but multiplication

aopbop=(ba)op.a^{\mathrm{op}}b^{\mathrm{op}}=(ba)^{\mathrm{op}}.

Thus (aop)=(a)op(a^{\mathrm{op}})^*=(a^*)^{\mathrm{op}} and aop=a\|a^{\mathrm{op}}\|=\|a\|. These operations satisfy the CC^*-identity, so AopA^{\mathrm{op}} is again a CC^*-algebra. This is the normed involutive refinement of the construction. The canonical map aaopa\mapsto a^{\mathrm{op}} reverses products; it is not generally an AAopA\to A^{\mathrm{op}}.

Modules and representations

A right action of AA is equivalently a left action of AopA^{\mathrm{op}}: writing ξa\xi a as ρ(aop)ξ\rho(a^{\mathrm{op}})\xi converts (ξa)b=ξ(ab)(\xi a)b=\xi(ab) into the homomorphism law for ρ\rho. This is why bimodules are represented by commuting left actions of AA and AopA^{\mathrm{op}}. If AA is commutative, the canonical product-reversing map is an isomorphism because reversing multiplication changes nothing.

Real spectral-triple convention

For a with representation π\pi and antiunitary real structure JJ, the standard right representation is

πop(bop)=Jπ(b)J1.\pi^{\mathrm{op}}(b^{\mathrm{op}})=J\pi(b^*)J^{-1}.

The involution inside this formula makes πop\pi^{\mathrm{op}} complex-linear under the usual antiunitary convention. The order-zero condition requires [π(a),πop(bop)]=0[\pi(a),\pi^{\mathrm{op}}(b^{\mathrm{op}})]=0. The first-order condition additionally requires [[D,π(a)],πop(bop)]=0\bigl[\, [D,\pi(a)],\pi^{\mathrm{op}}(b^{\mathrm{op}})\,\bigr]=0, where the inner commutator uses its . These conventions follow Connes, §2.

Examples and cautions

For matrix algebras, transposition gives a complex-linear *-isomorphism Mn(C)opMn(C)M_n(\mathbb C)^{\mathrm{op}}\cong M_n(\mathbb C). More generally, a CC^*-algebra may be isomorphic to its opposite without a preferred isomorphism, and such an isomorphism is extra structure. The notations aopa^{\mathrm{op}}, aa^\circ, and a0a^0 vary across the literature; the last two often denote the represented right action rather than the abstract element itself.

References
  1. Alain Connes, “Noncommutative Geometry and Reality,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 36 (1995), 6194–6231. DOI record. Relevant: §2 on the opposite-algebra representation and order conditions.
  2. Alain Connes and Matilde Marcolli, Noncommutative Geometry, Quantum Fields and Motives, American Mathematical Society, 2008. DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 1 on real spectral triples and bimodule conventions.