Definition

Let EE be a dense subspace of a HH, and suppose the [A,B][A,B] is defined on EE. It is a bounded commutator if there is a constant C0C\geq 0 such that

[A,B]ξCξ(ξE).\|[A,B]\xi\|\leq C\|\xi\|\qquad(\xi\in E).

The commutator then extends uniquely by continuity to a on HH. This extension, rather than the generally unbounded products ABAB and BABA, is also denoted [A,B][A,B]. Density of EE is essential for uniqueness; an estimate on a nondense common domain does not determine an operator on all of HH.

Extension criterion

The defining estimate makes [A,B]:EH[A,B]:E\to H continuous for the norm inherited from HH. Completing EE therefore produces the unique bounded extension, whose norm is

[A,B]=supξE, ξ0[A,B]ξξ.\|[A,B]\|=\sup_{\xi\in E,\ \xi\neq0} \frac{\|[A,B]\xi\|}{\|\xi\|}.

No separate assumption that the initial commutator is closed is needed. Its graph closure is precisely the graph of the bounded extension restricted to the closure of EE.

Spectral-triple convention

In a (A,H,D)(\mathcal A,H,D), the standard axiom means that every represented element π(a)\pi(a) preserves Dom(D)\operatorname{Dom}(D) and that the commutator [D,π(a)][D,\pi(a)], initially on Dom(D)\operatorname{Dom}(D), satisfies the bounded estimate above. The same symbol is then used for its unique extension to HH. Requiring only a bounded form commutator, or defining the expression on a smaller core, gives a variant of the axiom and should not be silently identified with this convention Connes and Moscovici, opening spectral-triple convention.

Examples and scope

For bounded operators AA and BB, the commutator is automatically bounded and satisfies [A,B]2AB\|[A,B]\|\leq2\|A\|\|B\|. More geometrically, for D=id/dxD=-i\,d/dx and multiplication MfM_f on the circle, the identity [D,Mf]=iMf[D,M_f]=-iM_{f'} shows that the commutator is bounded when ff' is essentially bounded. The axiom controls one derivative of ff; it does not assert that either product DMfDM_f or MfDM_fD is bounded.

References
  1. Alain Connes and Henri Moscovici, “The Local Index Formula in Noncommutative Geometry,” Geometric and Functional Analysis 5 (1995), 174–243. DOI record. Relevant: the spectral-triple hypotheses at the beginning of the article.
  2. José M. Gracia-Bondía, Joseph C. Várilly, and Héctor Figueroa, Elements of Noncommutative Geometry, Birkhäuser, 2001. DOI record. Relevant: §10.1 on the domain and bounded-extension convention.