Definition

Let (A,H,D,J)(\mathcal A,H,D,J) satisfy the and write b=JbJ1b^\circ=Jb^*J^{-1}. The first-order condition is

[[D,a],b]=0for every a,bA,\bigl[\, [D,a],b^\circ\,\bigr]=0 \qquad\text{for every }a,b\in\mathcal A,

where each [D,a][D,a], initially defined on Dom(D)\operatorname{Dom}(D), is replaced by its . Equivalently, the derivation

a[D,a]a\longmapsto [D,a]

takes values in bounded operators that are right A\mathcal A-linear for the opposite action. The axiom is strictly stronger than order zero: order zero concerns aa itself, while first order concerns its differential [D,a][D,a].

Differential meaning

For a first-order differential operator, commuting once with multiplication by a function removes the derivative and leaves an order-zero operator. Such an operator commutes with multiplication by a second function. The double commutator is the operator-algebraic form of this property.

More generally, the axiom ensures that represented one-forms

jaj[D,bj]\sum_j a_j[D,b_j]

are compatible with the right A\mathcal A-module structure. This is the reason the condition is separated from the bimodule-producing order-zero axiom Connes and Marcolli, equation (1.473).

Example and near miss

For the \not D on a closed spin manifold,

[,f]=c(df),[\not D,f]=c(df),

Clifford multiplication by dfdf. This is a bundle endomorphism and therefore commutes with right multiplication by every function gg, so first order holds.

The Laplace operator is a decisive near miss: although functions commute with the opposite action, [[Δ,f],g]\bigl[\, [\Delta,f],g\,\bigr] is generally multiplication by a nonzero multiple of the metric pairing of dfdf and dgdg. It therefore fails the first-order axiom.

References
  1. A. Connes, “Noncommutative Geometry and Reality,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 36 (1995), 6194–6231. DOI record. Relevant: §2 on the order-one relation.
  2. A. Connes and M. Marcolli, Noncommutative Geometry, Quantum Fields and Motives, American Mathematical Society, 2008. DOI record. Relevant: Definition 1.124, equation (1.473).
  3. S. Lord, A. Rennie, and J. C. Várilly, “Riemannian Manifolds in Noncommutative Geometry,” Journal of Geometry and Physics 62 (2012), 1611–1638. DOI record. Relevant: §§2–3 on bimodules and first-order conditions.