Definition

Two (A1,H1,D1)(\mathcal A_1,H_1,D_1) and (A2,H2,D2)(\mathcal A_2,H_2,D_2), with representations π1,π2\pi_1,\pi_2, are unitarily equivalent if there are a α:A1A2\alpha:\mathcal A_1\to\mathcal A_2 and a unitary, hence a , U:H1H2U:H_1\to H_2 such that

Uπ1(a)U=π2(α(a)),UD1U=D2U\pi_1(a)U^*=\pi_2(\alpha(a)),\qquad UD_1U^*=D_2

for every aA1a\in\mathcal A_1. The second equality includes UDom(D1)=Dom(D2)U\operatorname{Dom}(D_1)=\operatorname{Dom}(D_2). If the algebras are already identified, one usually takes α\alpha to be the identity.

Preserved structure

Unitary conjugation preserves self-adjointness, spectrum with multiplicity, compactness of the resolvent, and norms of commutators:

[D2,π2(α(a))]=U[D1,π1(a)]U.[D_2,\pi_2(\alpha(a))] =U[D_1,\pi_1(a)]U^*.

It therefore preserves summability and the Connes metric after states are transported by α\alpha. This is the basic sameness relation for changing a Hilbert-space realization without changing the represented metric data van Suijlekom, §2.2.1, Definition 2.24.

Additional structures

For even triples, equivalence also requires UΓ1U=Γ2U\Gamma_1U^*=\Gamma_2. For real triples it requires UJ1U=J2UJ_1U^*=J_2, with the algebra isomorphism understood in the represented left and right actions. Omitting these equations identifies the underlying ungraded complex triples but need not identify their parity or real structures.

Examples and distinctions

Changing an of HH conjugates all represented data and gives a unitarily equivalent triple. Likewise, a spin-preserving isometry of closed spin manifolds induces a unitary equivalence of their canonical spectral triples.

Equality of spectra of D1D_1 and D2D_2 alone is not enough: an isospectral unitary need not intertwine the algebra representations. Morita equivalence is also weaker and more flexible; it may change the Hilbert-space module rather than identify it by one unitary.

References
  1. Walter D. van Suijlekom, Noncommutative Geometry and Particle Physics, 2nd ed., Springer, 2025. Publisher chapter. Relevant: §2.2.1, Definition 2.24 on unitary equivalence of finite spectral triples.
  2. Alain Connes, Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Press, 1994. Author-hosted book. Relevant: Part VI on spectral triples, their represented data, and unitary changes of realization.