Let GG^* be a over a , choose a w\mathfrak w, and let φ:LFLG\varphi:L_F\to{}^LG^* be a relevant . The refined local Langlands correspondence predicts a canonical internal parametrization of the compound packet of φ\varphi by of the refined centralizer group:

Πφ    Irr ⁣(π0(Sφ+)).\Pi_\varphi \;\longleftrightarrow\; \operatorname{Irr}\!\left(\pi_0(S_\varphi^+)\right).

Here the left side ranges over of GG^*; on the right, the of an irreducible representation records the inner form on which the corresponding packet member lives.

Quasi-split fiber

Restricting to G(F)G^*(F) gives a parametrization by the appropriate center-quotiented . For tempered φ\varphi, the conjecturally unique w\mathfrak w-generic member corresponds to the trivial representation.

Why rigidification is present

An ordinary inner twist does not retain enough cohomological information to normalize and distinguish all packet members functorially. Pure inner twists suffice in some settings; rigid inner twists give a uniform framework for general connected reductive groups. The older notions of inner and pure inner forms are reviewed in .

Character identities

The parametrization is characterized not just as a bijection but through and endoscopic character identities. The trivial component-group element gives a stable packet distribution, while other elements select . Dependence on the Whittaker datum and rigidifying cocycle is governed by explicit character twists.

Status

Refined correspondences are theorems for archimedean groups and many important nonarchimedean families, including broad classes of classical groups. The uniform statement above remains conjectural for a general reductive group.

References
  1. Tasho Kaletha, “Representations of reductive groups over local fields,” §§2.2–2.3, 2022. arXiv.
  2. Tasho Kaletha, “Rigid inner forms of real and pp-adic groups,” Annals of Mathematics 184 (2016), 559–632. DOI.