Let F∈{R,C}\mathbb F\in\{\mathbb R,\mathbb C\}, and let π:E→M\pi:E\to M be a smooth finite-rank . Its sheaf of smooth sections, denoted E\mathcal E or Γ∞(−,E)\Gamma^\infty(-,E), assigns

E(U)=Γ∞(U,E∣U)\mathcal E(U)=\Gamma^\infty(U,E|_U)

to each open subset U⊆MU\subseteq M. Restriction of sections supplies the restriction maps. Sections that agree on overlaps glue uniquely, and smoothness is local, so this is a sheaf.

Pointwise scalar multiplication makes E\mathcal E a over the sheaf CM∞(F)C^\infty_M(\mathbb F), defined by

CM∞(F)(U)=C∞(U,F).C^\infty_M(\mathbb F)(U)=C^\infty(U,\mathbb F).

For F=R\mathbb F=\mathbb R, this is ; for F=C\mathbb F=\mathbb C, it is its complexification.

Local freeness

If E∣U≅U×FrE|_U\cong U\times\mathbb F^r, a local frame identifies

E∣U≅(CM∞(F)∣U)⊕r.\mathcal E|_U\cong \bigl(C^\infty_M(\mathbb F)|_U\bigr)^{\oplus r}.

Hence the section sheaf is a finite-rank . Its stalk Ex\mathcal E_x consists of germs of local sections near xx; it is a of rank rr over the CM,x∞(F)C^\infty_{M,x}(\mathbb F), the stalk of CM∞(F)C^\infty_M(\mathbb F) at xx.

Sheaf versus global module

The is the single module

E(M)=Γ∞(M,E)\mathcal E(M)=\Gamma^\infty(M,E)

over C∞(M,F)C^\infty(M,\mathbb F). The sheaf E\mathcal E includes sections over every open set and their gluing data. Local freeness of E\mathcal E does not assert that Γ∞(M,E)\Gamma^\infty(M,E) is a free module.

A E→FE\to F covering id⁡M\operatorname{id}_M induces a morphism E→F\mathcal E\to\mathcal F of CM∞C^\infty_M-module sheaves by postcomposition.

References
  1. John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., Springer, 2012. DOI record. Relevant: vector bundles, local frames, and smooth sections.
  2. Dale Husemoller, Fibre Bundles, 3rd ed., Springer, 1994. DOI record. Relevant: vector bundles and their local trivializations.