Let π:P→M\pi:P\to M be a , written using the standard convention that PP carries a right GG-action (see ). Let FF be a with a left GG-action, as in .

Form the

E:=P×GF  ⟶  M,E := P\times_G F \;\longrightarrow\; M,

as in .

Construction: section gives an equivariant map

Let s:M→Es:M\to E be a . Define a map Φs:P→F\Phi_s:P\to F by the rule:

  • given p∈Pp\in P with π(p)=x\pi(p)=x, write the point s(x)∈Exs(x)\in E_x as an equivalence class [p,f][p,f], and set Φs(p):=f\Phi_s(p):=f.

This is well-defined and smooth, and it satisfies the equivariance condition

Φs(p⋅g)=g−1⋅Φs(p)for all p∈P, g∈G,\Phi_s(p\cdot g) = g^{-1}\cdot \Phi_s(p) \qquad\text{for all }p\in P,\ g\in G,

i.e. Φs\Phi_s is an with respect to the right action on PP and the given left action on FF.

Converse: equivariant map gives a section

Conversely, if Φ:P→F\Phi:P\to F is smooth and satisfies Φ(p⋅g)=g−1⋅Φ(p)\Phi(p\cdot g)=g^{-1}\cdot \Phi(p), then

sΦ(x):=[p,Φ(p)]∈Exs_\Phi(x) := [p,\Phi(p)]\in E_x

is independent of the choice of p∈Pxp\in P_x and defines a smooth section sΦ:M→Es_\Phi:M\to E.

Together, these constructions give a natural bijection

Γ(E) ≅ { Φ:P→F smooth∣Φ(p⋅g)=g−1⋅Φ(p) }.\Gamma(E)\ \cong\ \{\,\Phi:P\to F\text{ smooth} \mid \Phi(p\cdot g)=g^{-1}\cdot \Phi(p)\,\}.
Examples
  1. Trivial principal bundle reduces equivariance to an ordinary map. If P=M×GP=M\times G is , then any section of E=(M×G)×GF≅M×FE=(M\times G)\times_G F \cong M\times F is the same as a smooth map u:M→Fu:M\to F. The corresponding equivariant map is
    Φu(x,g)=g−1⋅u(x).\Phi_u(x,g) = g^{-1}\cdot u(x).
  1. Associated and equivariant complex-valued functions. Take G=U(1)G=U(1) acting on F=CF=\mathbb C by scalar multiplication, and let E=P×U(1)CE=P\times_{U(1)}\mathbb C be the associated complex line bundle (see for the general vector-bundle case). A section of EE corresponds to a smooth function Φ:P→C\Phi:P\to\mathbb C satisfying
    Φ(p⋅eiθ)=e−iθ Φ(p).\Phi(p\cdot e^{i\theta}) = e^{-i\theta}\,\Phi(p).
    This is the standard “equivariant function” description of sections of a line bundle.
  1. Adjoint bundle: sections as conjugation-equivariant maps. Let F=GF=G with the conjugation action, so E=P×GGE=P\times_G G is the . A section then corresponds to a map Φ:P→G\Phi:P\to G satisfying
    Φ(p⋅g)=g−1Φ(p)g.\Phi(p\cdot g)=g^{-1}\Phi(p)g.
    Interpreting such sections as bundle automorphisms recovers the usual identification of the with sections of the adjoint bundle (compare ).