Statement

Let F:MNF:M\to N be a between finite-dimensional without boundary, and let pMp\in M. If the

dFp:TpMTF(p)NdF_p:T_pM\longrightarrow T_{F(p)}N

is a linear isomorphism, then there are open neighborhoods UU of pp and VV of F(p)F(p) such that FU:UVF|_U:U\to V is a diffeomorphism. Equivalently, FF is a at pp. Conversely, any smooth map that is a local diffeomorphism at pp has invertible differential there.

Why the manifold statement follows

Choose around pp and F(p)F(p). In coordinates, the differential of the representative of FF is invertible at the coordinate of pp. The Euclidean theorem supplies mutually inverse smooth maps on smaller open sets; conjugating them by the charts gives the required manifold neighborhoods. This also shows that the statement is independent of the chosen charts.

Consequences

Invertibility of dFpdF_p forces dimM=dimN\dim M=\dim N. Since invertible form an open subset, dFqdF_q remains invertible for all qq sufficiently near pp. Thus the set on which FF is a local diffeomorphism is open. A bijective local diffeomorphism is a diffeomorphism, because its locally defined smooth inverses agree with the set-theoretic inverse.

Scope and near misses

The theorem is local and does not imply global injectivity: the RS1\mathbb{R}\to S^1, teitt\mapsto e^{it}, has invertible differential everywhere but is not one-to-one. For manifolds with boundary, invertibility of the tangent map alone does not give this conclusion at without additional hypotheses controlling the boundary.

References
  1. J. M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., Springer, 2013. DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 4.
  2. L. W. Tu, An Introduction to Manifolds, 2nd ed., Springer, 2011. DOI record. Relevant: §6.7 and Remark 8.12.