Statement

Let f0,f1:MNf_0,f_1:M\to N be between . If f0f_0 and f1f_1 are joined by a , then their pullbacks induce the same homomorphism on every :

f0=f1:HdRk(N)HdRk(M).f_0^*=f_1^*:H_{\mathrm{dR}}^k(N)\longrightarrow H_{\mathrm{dR}}^k(M).

Indeed, the associated KK satisfies

f1f0=dK+Kd.f_1^*-f_0^*=dK+Kd.

Hence the difference of the endpoint pullbacks is cochain-homotopic to zero and vanishes on cohomology. The conclusion holds in every degree and is natural with respect to composition by smooth maps.

Consequences

A smooth induces an isomorphism on de Rham cohomology. In particular, a smooth deformation retract has the same de Rham cohomology as the retract. This makes HdRH_{\mathrm{dR}}^* a on the smooth homotopy category, not merely on the Bott–Tu, Chapter I, §4.

Canonical example

The radial homotopy F(x,t)=txF(x,t)=tx contracts Rn\mathbb R^n to the origin. Homotopy invariance therefore gives

HdR0(Rn)R,HdRk(Rn)=0(k>0).H_{\mathrm{dR}}^0(\mathbb R^n)\cong\mathbb R,\qquad H_{\mathrm{dR}}^k(\mathbb R^n)=0\quad(k>0).

At the level of forms, the same homotopy operator supplies primitives for closed forms of positive degree, which is the usual star-shaped-domain proof of the .

Scope

The theorem concerns smooth homotopies and ordinary de Rham cohomology. A continuous homotopy between smooth maps can be replaced by a smooth one under the standard smoothing theorem, but that extra step is not part of the chain-homotopy formula. Compact-support, relative, and boundary-condition variants require the homotopy operator to preserve the relevant support or restriction conditions Tu, Chapter 17.

References
  1. Raoul Bott and Loring W. Tu, Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology, Springer, 1982. Springer DOI record. Relevant: Chapter I, §4, homotopy operators and homotopy invariance.
  2. Loring W. Tu, An Introduction to Manifolds, 2nd ed., Springer, 2011. Springer DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 17, homotopy operator and induced maps on de Rham cohomology.