Statement

On a space-time domain in R3×R\mathbb R^3\times\mathbb R, let q>0q>0 satisfy the hypotheses of . Suppose smooth representatives Aj,BjA_j,B_j satisfy its increasing-order derivative estimates and

xBj=0,Bjxq=0.\nabla_x\cdot B_j=0,\qquad B_j\cdot\nabla_xq=0.

For a smooth divergence-free base u0u_0, cutoff scales can be chosen so that

u=u0+j1(x×(χ(ajq)Aj)+χ(ajq)Bj)u=u_0+\sum_{j\ge1}\left(\nabla_x\times(\chi(a_jq)A_j)+\chi(a_jq)B_j\right)

is smooth, locally finite, and divergence-free. Its difference from the uncut finite states has the same kind of increasing-order tail estimate, with a derivative loss independent of the stage.

Constraint and estimates

Each curl has zero divergence. The direct term has divergence χBj+ajχ(ajq)qBj=0\chi\nabla\cdot B_j+a_j\chi'(a_jq)\nabla q\cdot B_j=0. The curl product rule adds ajχ(ajq)q×Aja_j\chi'(a_jq)\nabla q\times A_j; estimates for the potential through one extra derivative control this term. At stage jj, impose the finite list of output derivative bounds through order jj before choosing aja_j. The diagonal and tail arguments then proceed as for scalar summation.

Geometry and boundaries

An axisymmetric azimuthal field Bj=bj(r,z,t)eθB_j=b_j(r,z,t)e_\theta satisfies these two constraints when qq is independent of the angle and the field has a smooth Cartesian representative. Smooth zero extensions across lateral support boundaries are hypotheses on the representatives. Multiplying velocities by cutoffs after taking curl would generally introduce a divergence defect.