Statement

Let 0<q<q0≤10<q<q_0\le1 on Ω\Omega, with qq smooth, bounded below on compact subsets, and ∣∂αq∣≤Cαq1−c∣α∣|\partial^\alpha q|\le C_\alpha q^{1-c|\alpha|}. Suppose smooth functions fjf_j, all on Ω\Omega, satisfy

∣fj∣m≤Cj,mqgj−ℓm(1+∣log⁡q∣)Pj,m,0<g1≤g2≤⋯→∞,|f_j|_m\le C_{j,m}q^{g_j-\ell_m}(1+|\log q|)^{P_{j,m}}, \qquad 0<g_1\le g_2\le\cdots\to\infty,

where ℓm≥0\ell_m\ge0 is nondecreasing and independent of jj. There are aj+1≥2aja_{j+1}\ge2a_j, a1−1<q0a_1^{-1}<q_0, such that

f=∑j≥1χ(ajq)fjf=\sum_{j\ge1}\chi(a_jq)f_j

is smooth and locally finite. With f[J]=∑j=1Jfjf^{[J]}=\sum_{j=1}^Jf_j, for J≥max⁡(1,m)J\ge\max(1,m) and q<(2aJ)−1q<(2a_J)^{-1},

∣f−f[J]∣m≤2−JqgJ+1/2−Lm,Lm=ℓm+cm.|f-f^{[J]}|_m\le2^{-J}q^{g_{J+1}/2-L_m},\qquad L_m=\ell_m+cm.

Here χ=1\chi=1 on [0,1/2][0,1/2] and χ=0\chi=0 on [1,∞)[1,\infty). This is asymptotic summation.

Choice and tail proof

The cutoff derivative bound and Leibniz rule bound the jj-th cutoff term through order mm by C^j,mqgj−Lm(1+∣log⁡q∣)P^j,m\widehat C_{j,m}q^{g_j-L_m}(1+|\log q|)^{\widehat P_{j,m}}. Choose aja_j so that the coefficient times qgj/2q^{g_j/2} is at most 2−j2^{-j} for m≤jm\le j throughout q≤aj−1q\le a_j^{-1}. This is a finite list of vanishing requirements.

On a compact subset, q≥δ>0q\ge\delta>0, so only finitely many cutoff terms survive. For q<(2aJ)−1q<(2a_J)^{-1}, the first JJ cutoffs equal one. The remaining derivative bounds sum to at most qgJ+1/2−Lm∑j>J2−jq^{g_{J+1}/2-L_m}\sum_{j>J}2^{-j}, proving the tail estimate.

Retaining the original orders

To compare after a fixed truncation NN, choose a larger fixed JJ with gJ+1/2≥gN+1g_{J+1}/2\ge g_{N+1}. The finite block N+1,…,JN+1,\ldots,J retains its original orders near zero; the tail has the desired order by the estimate. Logs can be retained or absorbed by a small power loss. This realizes an asymptotic expansion without asserting convergence of the uncut series.

References