Let Γ\Gamma be a discrete group and C[Γ]\mathbb C[\Gamma] its , with δg∗=δg−1\delta_g^*=\delta_{g^{-1}}. Its full group C∗C^*-algebra C∗(Γ)C^*(\Gamma) is the completion in the over all unitary representations of Γ\Gamma. Its reduced group C∗C^*-algebra Cr∗(Γ)C_r^*(\Gamma) is the completion in the norm induced by the left regular representation on ℓ2(Γ)\ell^2(\Gamma). The phrase “group C∗C^*-algebra” is therefore ambiguous unless the full or reduced completion is specified.

Concrete construction

For a finitely supported function f:Γ→Cf:\Gamma\to\mathbb C, write f=∑gf(g)δgf=\sum_g f(g)\delta_g. The left acts by

λ(f)ξ(s)=∑g∈Γf(g)ξ(g−1s).\lambda(f)\xi(s)=\sum_{g\in\Gamma}f(g)\xi(g^{-1}s).

Completing λ(C[Γ])\lambda(\mathbb C[\Gamma]) in gives . Taking the supremum over the integrated forms of all unitary representations gives .

Comparison of the completions

Because the regular representation is among the representations used in the full norm, the identity on C[Γ]\mathbb C[\Gamma] extends to a canonical surjective ∗*-homomorphism

C∗(Γ)⟶Cr∗(Γ).C^*(\Gamma)\longrightarrow C_r^*(\Gamma).

It is an isomorphism exactly when Γ\Gamma is . Hence the two constructions agree for finite, abelian, and more generally amenable discrete groups, but not for on at least two generators.

Examples and conventions

For Γ=Z\Gamma=\mathbb Z, Fourier transform identifies both completions with C(T)C(\mathbb T). For a finite group, the group C∗C^*-algebra is a finite-dimensional direct sum of matrix algebras determined by the . Both completions are unital for every discrete group, with unit δe\delta_e. The notation C∗(Γ)C^*(\Gamma) conventionally means the full completion, whereas Cr∗(Γ)C_r^*(\Gamma) always means the reduced one.

References
  1. Nathanial P. Brown and Narutaka Ozawa, C∗C^*-Algebras and Finite-Dimensional Approximations, American Mathematical Society, 2008. AMS DOI record. Relevant: §§2.5–2.6 on discrete group C∗C^*-algebras and amenability.
  2. Kenneth R. Davidson, C∗C^*-Algebras by Example, American Mathematical Society, 1996. AMS DOI record. Relevant: examples of full and reduced group C∗C^*-algebras.