Let AA be a and let πi:A→B(Hi)\pi_i:A\to B(H_i), i∈Ii\in I, be . Their direct sum is the representation

⨁i∈Iπi:A⟶B(⨁i∈IHi)\bigoplus_{i\in I}\pi_i:A\longrightarrow B\left(\bigoplus_{i\in I}H_i\right)

defined by

(⨁iπi)(a)(ξi)i=(πi(a)ξi)i.\left(\bigoplus_i\pi_i\right)(a)(\xi_i)_i =(\pi_i(a)\xi_i)_i.

It is well defined because ∥πi(a)∥≤∥a∥\|\pi_i(a)\|\leq\|a\| uniformly in ii. The representation space is the Hilbert direct sum, so its vectors satisfy ∑i∥ξi∥2<∞\sum_i\|\xi_i\|^2<\infty, even when II is uncountable. Products, adjoints, and are preserved coordinatewise, so this bounded operator-valued map is again a C∗C^*-representation.

Kernels and faithfulness

The kernel satisfies

ker⁡(⨁iπi)=⋂iker⁡(πi).\ker\left(\bigoplus_i\pi_i\right)=\bigcap_i\ker(\pi_i).

Consequently, the direct sum is faithful exactly when the family (πi)(\pi_i) of AA. This observation constructs faithful representations from sufficiently large families and underlies the .

Nondegeneracy and reducing summands

Each HiH_i is a reducing subspace for the direct-sum representation. If every πi\pi_i is nondegenerate, then ⨁iπi\bigoplus_i\pi_i is nondegenerate; conversely, a zero or degenerate summand remains visible as a degenerate reducing part. Unitary intertwiners on the summands assemble into a unitary intertwiner of their direct sums.

Examples and distinction

For characters χ1,…,χn\chi_1,\ldots,\chi_n of a commutative C∗C^*-algebra, ⨁jχj\bigoplus_j\chi_j is the corresponding diagonal matrix representation. The construction is not a direct integral: a direct sum uses counting measure and square-summable coordinate families, whereas a requires measurable fields and ignores changes on .

References
  1. Gerard J. Murphy, C∗C^*-Algebras and Operator Theory, Academic Press, 1990. DOI record. Relevant: §3.4 on direct sums, cyclic representations, and the universal representation.