Statement

For a good embedded and its , there is a unique ssl5(C)\mathfrak s\cong\mathfrak{sl}_5(\mathbb C) such that

gSMssl6SM.\mathfrak g_{\mathrm{SM}} \subset\mathfrak s \subset\mathfrak{sl}_6^{\mathrm{SM}}.

This s\mathfrak s is in e7\mathfrak e_7 and is called the standard sl5\mathfrak{sl}_5, denoted sl5SM\mathfrak{sl}_5^{\mathrm{SM}}.

All displayed containments are Lie-subalgebra inclusions. In particular,

gSMsl5SMsl6SMe7\mathfrak g_{\mathrm{SM}} \subset\mathfrak{sl}_5^{\mathrm{SM}} \subset\mathfrak{sl}_6^{\mathrm{SM}} \subset\mathfrak e_7

is a chain, not a direct-sum decomposition.

Root-system construction

Let hSM\mathfrak h_{\mathrm{SM}} be the of the regular gSM\mathfrak g_{\mathrm{SM}}, and let UU be its real form in the E7E_7 root space. The roots in Φ(E7)U\Phi(E_7)\cap U form an A4A_4 subsystem of 2020 roots, hence define a regular copy of . Since UPU\perp P, this subsystem lies in the A5A_5 roots of sl6SM\mathfrak{sl}_6^{\mathrm{SM}}.

Why uniqueness does not require regularity

View the defining module of sl6SM\mathfrak{sl}_6^{\mathrm{SM}} as C6\mathbb C^6. Any embedded sl5sl6\mathfrak{sl}_5\subset\mathfrak{sl}_6 acts as

C6=WL,dimW=5,dimL=1,\mathbb C^6=W\oplus L, \qquad \dim W=5, \qquad \dim L=1,

with WW the defining module and LL trivial. Under gSM\mathfrak g_{\mathrm{SM}}, the of the defining C6\mathbb C^6 is exactly one line, so LL is forced. The remaining irreducible 33- and 22-dimensional Standard Model summands admit no to LL, so their invariant complement WW, and hence the embedded sl(W)\mathfrak{sl}(W), are forced as well.

Physical representation-theory role

This is the Lie-algebra form of the . Restricting the generation modules through sl6SMsl5SMgSM\mathfrak{sl}_6^{\mathrm{SM}}\supset\mathfrak{sl}_5^{\mathrm{SM}}\supset\mathfrak g_{\mathrm{SM}} produces the .

References
  1. John C. Baez, “Three Generations in E7,” 2026, Proposition 8. arXiv:2608.06271.
  2. Howard Georgi and Sheldon L. Glashow, “Unity of All Elementary-Particle Forces,” Physical Review Letters 32 (1974), 438–441. DOI record.
  3. John C. Baez and John Huerta, “The Algebra of Grand Unified Theories,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 47 (2010), 483–552. arXiv:0904.1556.