Definition

Let

gSMsl3(C)sl2(C)C\mathfrak g_{\mathrm{SM}}\cong \mathfrak{sl}_3(\mathbb C)\oplus\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C)\oplus\mathbb C

be the . A good Standard Model embedding in e7\mathfrak e_7 is an embedding ι:gSMe7\iota:\mathfrak g_{\mathrm{SM}}\hookrightarrow\mathfrak e_7 carried by an automorphism of to the embedding obtained by down the exceptional chain and then taking the relevant of sl5\mathfrak{sl}_5.

Thus “good” specifies an automorphism class of embeddings, not merely an abstract subalgebra isomorphic to gSM\mathfrak g_{\mathrm{SM}}.

Equivalent construction through SU(5)

Start with the block-diagonal , pass to complex

gSMsl5(C),\mathfrak g_{\mathrm{SM}}\subset\mathfrak{sl}_5(\mathbb C),

and embed sl5\mathfrak{sl}_5 as a regular A4A_4-subalgebra of e7\mathfrak e_7. All A4A_4 of E7E_7 lie in one Weyl-group orbit, so this gives the same automorphism class.

Why the qualification matters

An abstract inclusion of a copy of sl3sl2C\mathfrak{sl}_3\oplus\mathfrak{sl}_2\oplus\mathbb C in e7\mathfrak e_7 need not have the centralizers and used in the three-generation construction. The adjective “good” records the regular-position hypothesis from which the , , and subsequent decompositions follow.

Dependence on choices

The definition is invariant under automorphisms of e7\mathfrak e_7. Choosing a particular representative embedding is still necessary to regard the constructed algebras as literal subalgebras rather than only as conjugacy classes. Later choices of and roots are additional and are not part of “goodness.”

References
  1. John C. Baez, “Three Generations in E7,” 2026, §2. arXiv:2608.06271.
  2. Toshio Oshima, “A Classification of Subsystems of a Root System,” 2006, especially the tables of subsystem orbits. arXiv:math/0611904.
  3. E. B. Dynkin, “Semisimple Subalgebras of Semisimple Lie Algebras,” American Mathematical Society Translations, Series 2, 6 (1957), 111–244.