Statement

Let g\mathfrak g be a finite-dimensional complex , and let hg\mathfrak h\subseteq\mathfrak g be a , understood here as a maximal toral subalgebra. Then

Ng(h)={Xg:[X,h]h}=h.N_{\mathfrak{g}}(\mathfrak{h})=\{X\in\mathfrak{g}:[X,\mathfrak{h}]\subset \mathfrak{h}\}=\mathfrak{h}.
Proof from the root-space decomposition

Use the

g=hαΦgα.\mathfrak g=\mathfrak h\oplus\bigoplus_{\alpha\in\Phi}\mathfrak g_\alpha.

Write X=X0+αΦXαX=X_0+\sum_{\alpha\in\Phi}X_\alpha, where X0hX_0\in\mathfrak h and XαgαX_\alpha\in\mathfrak g_\alpha. If XX normalizes h\mathfrak h, then for every HhH\in\mathfrak h,

[H,X]=αΦα(H)Xαh.[H,X]=\sum_{\alpha\in\Phi}\alpha(H)X_\alpha\in\mathfrak h.

The sum is direct, so α(H)Xα=0\alpha(H)X_\alpha=0 for every HH. For each root α\alpha, some HH has α(H)0\alpha(H)\ne0; hence Xα=0X_\alpha=0. Therefore X=X0hX=X_0\in\mathfrak h.

Convention outside the semisimple case

For a general finite-dimensional Lie algebra over an algebraically closed field of 00, a common definition says that a Cartan subalgebra is a nilpotent, self-normalizing subalgebra. Under that convention, the displayed equality is part of the definition rather than a separate lemma. The substantive semisimple statement above is that the alternative “maximal toral” characterization implies self-normalization.

References
  1. James E. Humphreys, Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory, Springer, 1972, §8. Publisher record.
  2. Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed., Birkhäuser, 2002, Chapter II. Publisher record.