Core idea

Let GG be a connected, simply connected nilpotent with g\mathfrak g, let g\ell\in\mathfrak g^*, and choose a real p\mathfrak p at \ell. Since the is a diffeomorphism, P=exp(p)P=\exp(\mathfrak p) is a closed connected subgroup. Subordination gives a unitary character

χ(expX)=ei(X),Xp.\chi_\ell(\exp X)=e^{i\ell(X)},\qquad X\in\mathfrak p.

The induced representation attached to (,p)(\ell,\mathfrak p) is

π,p=IndPGχ,\pi_{\ell,\mathfrak p}=\operatorname{Ind}_P^G\chi_\ell,

formed by . It is a of GG; in the nilpotent setting it is irreducible and its depends only on the of \ell.

Why subordination produces a character

The condition ([p,p])=0\ell([\mathfrak p,\mathfrak p])=0 makes ipi\ell|_{\mathfrak p} a one-dimensional representation of the Lie algebra p\mathfrak p. Because PP is connected and simply connected, it integrates uniquely to χ\chi_\ell. The gives the same conclusion directly: every commutator term is annihilated by \ell.

The convention e2πi(X)e^{2\pi i\ell(X)} is also common. It amounts to rescaling the parameter \ell and must be coordinated with the chosen Fourier-transform convention.

Independence and orbit invariance

Different polarizations at the same \ell yield unitarily equivalent representations. If =Ad(g)\ell'=\operatorname{Ad}^*(g)\ell, conjugation carries a polarization at \ell to one at \ell', and the resulting are again equivalent. Conversely, for connected simply connected nilpotent GG, equivalence of these representations implies that \ell and \ell' lie on the same orbit Kirillov, §§5–6.

Heisenberg example

For the three-dimensional , take (Z)=λ0\ell(Z)=\lambda\ne0 on the central generator and choose p=span{Y,Z}\mathfrak p=\operatorname{span}\{Y,Z\}. The construction induces the character ei(ηy+λz)e^{i(\eta y+\lambda z)} of PP to the Schrödinger representation with central character eiλze^{i\lambda z}. Changing the polarization to span{X,Z}\operatorname{span}\{X,Z\} gives its Fourier-equivalent model.

Scope

The construction can be written for more general Lie groups, but irreducibility, independence of polarization, and exhaustion of the unitary dual can fail without the connected, simply connected, nilpotent hypotheses. Positivity or Pukánszky conditions are often imposed in broader orbit-method settings.

References
  1. A. A. Kirillov, “Unitary Representations of Nilpotent Lie Groups,” Russian Mathematical Surveys 17, no. 4 (1962), 53–104. DOI record. Relevant: §§5–6, polarizations, induced representations, and orbit invariance.
  2. Lawrence J. Corwin and Frederick P. Greenleaf, Representations of Nilpotent Lie Groups and Their Applications, Part I: Basic Theory and Examples, Cambridge University Press, 1990. Publisher front matter. Relevant: Chapter 2, the inducing construction and polarization independence.