Construction
Induced representation attached to a polarization
The unitary representation obtained by inducing the character defined by a coadjoint functional from a polarizing subgroup.
Core idea
Let be a connected, simply connected nilpotent Lie group with Lie algebra , let , and choose a real polarization at . Since the exponential map is a diffeomorphism, is a closed connected subgroup. Subordination gives a unitary character
The induced representation attached to is
formed by unitary induction. It is a strongly continuous unitary representation of ; in the nilpotent setting it is irreducible and its equivalence class depends only on the coadjoint orbit of .
Why subordination produces a character
The condition makes a one-dimensional representation of the Lie algebra . Because is connected and simply connected, it integrates uniquely to . The Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula gives the same conclusion directly: every commutator term is annihilated by .
The convention is also common. It amounts to rescaling the parameter and must be coordinated with the chosen Fourier-transform convention.
Independence and orbit invariance
Different polarizations at the same yield unitarily equivalent representations. If , conjugation carries a polarization at to one at , and the resulting induced representations are again equivalent. Conversely, for connected simply connected nilpotent , equivalence of these representations implies that and lie on the same orbit Kirillov, §§5–6.
Heisenberg example
For the three-dimensional Heisenberg group, take on the central generator and choose . The construction induces the character of to the Schrödinger representation with central character . Changing the polarization to gives its Fourier-equivalent model.
Scope
The construction can be written for more general Lie groups, but irreducibility, independence of polarization, and exhaustion of the unitary dual can fail without the connected, simply connected, nilpotent hypotheses. Positivity or Pukánszky conditions are often imposed in broader orbit-method settings.
References
- A. A. Kirillov, “Unitary Representations of Nilpotent Lie Groups,” Russian Mathematical Surveys 17, no. 4 (1962), 53–104. DOI record. Relevant: §§5–6, polarizations, induced representations, and orbit invariance.
- Lawrence J. Corwin and Frederick P. Greenleaf, Representations of Nilpotent Lie Groups and Their Applications, Part I: Basic Theory and Examples, Cambridge University Press, 1990. Publisher front matter. Relevant: Chapter 2, the inducing construction and polarization independence.