Core idea

For a compatible choice of and in e7\mathfrak e_7, repeated gives a chain of

sl3sl2sl5so10e6e7.\mathfrak{sl}_3\oplus\mathfrak{sl}_2 \subset \mathfrak{sl}_5 \subset \mathfrak{so}_{10} \subset \mathfrak e_6 \subset \mathfrak e_7.

Equivalently, its root-system types are

A2+A1A4D5E6E7.A_2+A_1\subset A_4\subset D_5\subset E_6\subset E_7.

Inside the A4A_4 stage, delete the node that leaves A2+A1A_2+A_1 but retain the full A4A_4 Cartan. This produces the

(sl3sl2)CgSM.(\mathfrak{sl}_3\oplus\mathfrak{sl}_2)\oplus\mathbb C \cong \mathfrak g_{\mathrm{SM}}.

Every displayed inclusion is a Lie-algebra inclusion. This chain is not a direct-sum decomposition of e7\mathfrak e_7.

Root-system construction

Given simple roots α1,,αn\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_n, retain the roots in the integer span of α1,,αn1\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_{n-1} and the corresponding smaller Cartan subspace. Iterating the operation along the selected E7E_7 diagram produces the

E7E6E5=D5E4=A4E3=A2+A1.E_7\supset E_6\supset E_5=D_5\supset E_4=A_4\supset E_3=A_2+A_1.

The last equality is an equality of root-system types and hence of the associated complex .

Role in the E7 construction

The chain supplies a concrete of gSM\mathfrak g_{\mathrm{SM}} in e7\mathfrak e_7. It also exhibits the familiar sl5\mathfrak{sl}_5, so10\mathfrak{so}_{10}, and e6\mathfrak e_6 enlargements in one regular-subalgebra framework.

Dependence on choices

The literal embedded chain depends on a Cartan subalgebra, a simple-root system, and an ordering of the deleted nodes. Its automorphism class is the invariant relevant here. The abelian C\mathbb C in gSM\mathfrak g_{\mathrm{SM}} is a Levi-center direction; it is not an extra simple factor in the semisimple root-system chain.

References
  1. John C. Baez, “Three Generations in E7,” 2026, §2 and Table 2. arXiv:2608.06271.
  2. E. B. Dynkin, “Semisimple Subalgebras of Semisimple Lie Algebras,” American Mathematical Society Translations, Series 2, 6 (1957), 111–244.
  3. John C. Baez and John Huerta, “The Algebra of Grand Unified Theories,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 47 (2010), 483–552. arXiv:0904.1556.