Statement

Let GG be a , KK a , and P=MANP=MAN a . The Casselman subrepresentation theorem states that every irreducible VV for (g,K)(\mathfrak g,K) admits an injective (g,K)(\mathfrak g,K)-homomorphism

VIndPG(σeν1N)K-finiteV\hookrightarrow \operatorname{Ind}_{P}^{G}(\sigma\otimes e^\nu\otimes 1_N)_{K\text{-finite}}

for some finite-dimensional σ\sigma of MM and some νaC\nu\in\mathfrak a_{\mathbb C}^{*}. Thus every irreducible admissible module occurs as a submodule of a generally nonunitary . The embedding is algebraic and need not split.

Meaning of the hypotheses

A Harish–Chandra module here is a finitely generated admissible (g,K)(\mathfrak g,K)-module on which the KK-action is algebraic and compatible with the differentiated g\mathfrak g-action. Irreducibility is taken in this algebraic category. The principal series in the target is likewise replaced by its KK-finite vectors, so the theorem does not assert an embedding between arbitrary Hilbert completions.

Proof mechanism and uses

Casselman’s Jacquet-module construction produces a nonzero exponent and finite-dimensional MAMA-data. Frobenius reciprocity then converts the resulting quotient of a Jacquet module into an embedding of VV into induced representation data. This connects asymptotic expansions of matrix coefficients with principal series and underlies comparison results for globalizations Casselman, pp. 557–563.

Scope and contrast

The theorem is complementary to the : Casselman embeds an irreducible module into some principal series, whereas Langlands realizes it as the unique quotient of a positively ordered standard module. Neither statement says that every irreducible representation is itself a full principal-series module, and the inducing data in Casselman’s embedding need not be unique.

References
  1. William Casselman, “Jacquet Modules for Real Reductive Groups,” in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Helsinki 1978, vol. 1, Academia Scientiarum Fennica, 1980, 557–563. IMU proceedings PDF. Relevant: Jacquet modules, asymptotics, and embeddings into induced representations.
  2. William Casselman, “Jacquet Modules for Real Reductive Groups.” Author-maintained publication record. Relevant: bibliographic record and original article pagination.