Definition

Let GG be a real , KGK\subseteq G a compact subgroup with k0\mathfrak k_0, and g=Lie(G)RC\mathfrak g=\operatorname{Lie}(G)\otimes_{\mathbb R}\mathbb C. A (g,K)(\mathfrak g,K)-module is a complex VV with a structure and a KK-action such that every vector is , the differential of the KK-action equals the restricted k0\mathfrak k_0-action, and

k(Xv)=(Ad(k)X)(kv)k\cdot(X\cdot v)=(\operatorname{Ad}(k)X)\cdot(k\cdot v)

for kKk\in K, XgX\in\mathfrak g, and vVv\in V. These conditions make the two actions infinitesimally and globally compatible.

Equivalent algebraic viewpoint

The g\mathfrak g-action extends uniquely to an action of the U(g)U(\mathfrak g). The displayed compatibility then becomes

k(uv)=(Ad(k)u)(kv)(uU(g)).k\cdot(u\cdot v)=(\operatorname{Ad}(k)u)\cdot(k\cdot v) \qquad (u\in U(\mathfrak g)).

Thus a (g,K)(\mathfrak g,K)-module retains both differential operators coming from GG and the discrete decomposition into irreducible compact-group types. Wallach gives this definition and its basic algebraic consequences in §3.3.

Relation to group representations

For a suitable smooth representation of GG, its KK-finite smooth vectors inherit a (g,K)(\mathfrak g,K)-module structure by differentiation. Passing to this subspace discards the ambient topology but preserves much of the representation’s algebraic information. The reverse passage—from a (g,K)(\mathfrak g,K)-module to a topological representation of GG—is a globalization problem and is not part of the definition.

Conventions and scope

In the standard real-reductive setting, KK is a and g\mathfrak g is the complexified Lie algebra. Some sources formulate the KK-action as an algebraic representation of a complex reductive group or impose connectedness assumptions. The local-finiteness and compatibility axioms above are the compact-group convention used in analytic representation theory.

References
  1. Nolan R. Wallach, Real Reductive Groups I, Academic Press, 1988. Publisher record. Relevant: Chapter 3, §3.3, “(g,K)(\mathfrak g,K)-modules.”
  2. Anthony W. Knapp and David A. Vogan Jr., Cohomological Induction and Unitary Representations, Princeton University Press, 1995. Publisher record. Relevant: Chapter II on the category C(g,K)C(\mathfrak g,K).