An algebraic automorphic representation is an over a whose archimedean have integral infinitesimal data. This phrase is incomplete unless its normalization is specified.

In the Buzzard–Gee terminology the two standard normalizations are and . They differ by the half-sum of the .

Classical convention for general linear groups

For an of GLn(AF)\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb A_F), Clozel's “algebraic” condition agrees with the modern CC-algebraic condition: its at each archimedean place is that of a finite-dimensional algebraic representation. Authors often say simply “algebraic” in this setting.

A twist by a suitable half-integral power of the norm converts the CC-normalization to the LL-normalization when that twist exists. For a general , such a twist need not exist on the group itself.

Cohomology and Galois representations

A is CC-algebraic. By contrast, LL-algebraicity is the normalization naturally used when conjecturing a Galois representation valued directly in the usual LL-group. A CC-algebraic representation is expected to give a representation valued in the associated CC-group.

Usage rule

Statements such as “algebraic automorphic representations have Galois representations” must specify:

  1. CC- or LL-normalization;
  2. the reductive group and coefficient field;
  3. regularity, cuspidality, polarization, or other hypotheses;
  4. whether the claim is a theorem or a conjecture;
  5. the target LL-group or CC-group.
References
  1. Laurent Clozel, “Motifs et formes automorphes: applications du principe de fonctorialité,” in Automorphic Forms, Shimura Varieties, and LL-Functions, vol. I, 1990, pp. 77–159.
  2. Kevin Buzzard and Toby Gee, “The conjectural connections between automorphic representations and Galois representations,” Automorphic Forms and Galois Representations, vol. 1, 2014. arXiv.