Algebraic automorphic representation
An automorphic representation with integral archimedean infinitesimal data, with the normalization stated explicitly.
An algebraic automorphic representation is an automorphic representation over a number field whose archimedean Langlands parameters have integral infinitesimal data. This phrase is incomplete unless its normalization is specified.
In the Buzzard–Gee terminology the two standard normalizations are -algebraic and -algebraic. They differ by the half-sum of the positive roots.
Classical convention for general linear groups
For an isobaric automorphic representation of , Clozel's “algebraic” condition agrees with the modern -algebraic condition: its infinitesimal character at each archimedean place is that of a finite-dimensional algebraic representation. Authors often say simply “algebraic” in this setting.
A twist by a suitable half-integral power of the norm converts the -normalization to the -normalization when that twist exists. For a general reductive group, such a twist need not exist on the group itself.
Cohomology and Galois representations
A cohomological automorphic representation is -algebraic. By contrast, -algebraicity is the normalization naturally used when conjecturing a Galois representation valued directly in the usual -group. A -algebraic representation is expected to give a representation valued in the associated -group.
Usage rule
Statements such as “algebraic automorphic representations have Galois representations” must specify:
- - or -normalization;
- the reductive group and coefficient field;
- regularity, cuspidality, polarization, or other hypotheses;
- whether the claim is a theorem or a conjecture;
- the target -group or -group.
References
- Laurent Clozel, “Motifs et formes automorphes: applications du principe de fonctorialité,” in Automorphic Forms, Shimura Varieties, and -Functions, vol. I, 1990, pp. 77–159.
- Kevin Buzzard and Toby Gee, “The conjectural connections between automorphic representations and Galois representations,” Automorphic Forms and Galois Representations, vol. 1, 2014. arXiv.