Definition

Let T:Dom(T)XXT:\operatorname{Dom}(T)\subseteq X\to X be a on a . A DDom(T)D\subseteq\operatorname{Dom}(T) is a core for TT if the closure of the restricted operator TDT|_D is TT. Equivalently, DD is dense in Dom(T)\operatorname{Dom}(T) for the

xT=x+Tx.\|x\|_T=\|x\|+\|Tx\|.

Thus every xDom(T)x\in\operatorname{Dom}(T) admits xnDx_n\in D with both xnxx_n\to x and TxnTxTx_n\to Tx in XX. Density of DD in XX alone is not enough.

Graph interpretation

The graph of TDT|_D is

{(x,Tx):xD}X×X.\{(x,Tx):x\in D\}\subseteq X\times X.

The core condition says that its closure is exactly the graph of TT. Consequently, values of TT on the smaller test domain determine the closed operator uniquely. This is why differential operators are often first computed on smooth compactly supported functions and then recovered by graph closure.

How cores are used

Suppose SS is a with Dom(S)=DDom(T)\operatorname{Dom}(S)=D\subseteq\operatorname{Dom}(T) and Sx=TxSx=Tx on DD. Then DD is a core for TT exactly when S=T\overline S=T. In particular, proving that a proposed test domain is a core justifies checking identities and approximation arguments there before passing to the full domain Schmüdgen, Chapter 1.

Warning: ambient density versus graph density

For an unbounded operator, convergence xnxx_n\to x does not control TxnTx_n. A dense invariant subspace can therefore fail to be a core. Likewise, “essential domain” is sometimes used as a synonym for a core, but in discussions of the nearby phrase “essentially self-adjoint” adds a separate assertion about the closure being self-adjoint.

References
  1. Tosio Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, 2nd ed., Springer, 1995. Publisher record. Relevant: Chapter III on closability, graph norms, and cores.
  2. Konrad Schmüdgen, Unbounded Self-adjoint Operators on Hilbert Space, Springer, 2012. Publisher record. Relevant: Chapter 1 on closed operators and core domains.