Let T:Dom⁡(T)⊆H→KT:\operatorname{Dom}(T)\subseteq H\to K be a linear operator between ; its domain need not be all of HH. The operator TT is closable if the closure of its in H⊕KH\oplus K is the graph of an operator. That operator is denoted T‾\overline T, called the closure of TT, and is the smallest extending TT. Equivalently, whenever xn∈Dom⁡(T)x_n\in\operatorname{Dom}(T), xn→0x_n\to0, and Txn→yTx_n\to y, one must have y=0y=0. This criterion prevents the graph closure from assigning two different values to the same input.

Characterizations by extensions

An operator is closable exactly when it has at least one closed extension. If SS is any closed extension of TT, then T‾⊆S\overline T\subseteq S, including containment of domains. An operator is already closed precisely when T=T‾T=\overline T. These statements concern graph closure, not merely closure of Dom⁡(T)\operatorname{Dom}(T) in HH.

Adjoint criterion

If TT is densely defined, its Hilbert-space adjoint T∗T^* is closed, and

T is closable⟺Dom⁡(T∗) is dense in K.T\text{ is closable}\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \operatorname{Dom}(T^*)\text{ is dense in }K.

In that case T‾=T∗∗\overline T=T^{**}. Density of the original domain is needed to define T∗T^* as an operator, but it is not needed for the graph-based definition of closability itself.

Examples and a non-example

The derivative d/dxd/dx on Cc∞(0,1)⊂L2(0,1)C_c^\infty(0,1)\subset L^2(0,1) is closable; its closure has domain H01(0,1)H_0^1(0,1). By contrast, let T:c00⊂ℓ2→ℓ2T:c_{00}\subset \ell^2\to\ell^2 satisfy Ten=ne1Te_n=n e_1. Then xn=en/n→0x_n=e_n/n\to0 but Txn=e1Tx_n=e_1, so TT is not closable. This example shows that a need not be closable.

References
  1. Tosio Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, 2nd ed., corrected reprint, Springer, 1995. DOI record. Relevant: Chapter III, §5 on closed and closable operators.
  2. Konrad Schmüdgen, Unbounded Self-adjoint Operators on Hilbert Space, Springer, 2012. DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 1 on graphs, closures, and adjoints.