Core idea

Let GG have a on (M,ω)(M,\omega) with equivariant μ:Mg\mu:M\to\mathfrak g^*, let αg\alpha\in\mathfrak g^*, and let Oα\mathcal O_\alpha be its . Equip Oα\mathcal O_\alpha^{-} with the negative of its . The diagonal action on

(M×Oα,ωωKKS)(M\times\mathcal O_\alpha^{-},\,\omega\oplus-\omega_{\mathrm{KKS}})

has moment map

μ~(m,ξ)=μ(m)ξ.\widetilde\mu(m,\xi)=\mu(m)-\xi.

The shifting trick replaces reduction at α\alpha by zero-level reduction of this product. Set-theoretically, and symplectically whenever the regular-reduction hypotheses hold,

μ1(α)/Gαμ~1(0)/G.\mu^{-1}(\alpha)/G_\alpha\cong\widetilde\mu^{-1}(0)/G.

This construction keeps the original while moving the chosen momentum level to zero.

Construction of the identification

The zero set consists of pairs (m,ξ)(m,\xi) with μ(m)=ξOα\mu(m)=\xi\in\mathcal O_\alpha. Every diagonal GG-orbit in this set has a representative (m,α)(m,\alpha): choose gg carrying ξ\xi to α\alpha. Two such representatives (m,α)(m,\alpha) and (m,α)(m',\alpha) are in the same diagonal orbit exactly when they differ by an element of GαG_\alpha. This gives the displayed bijection.

Equivalently, both sides identify with the orbit-reduction space

μ1(Oα)/G.\mu^{-1}(\mathcal O_\alpha)/G.

Under free and proper regularity assumptions, the bijection is a diffeomorphism and the pullback characterizations of the reduced forms show that it is a Ortega and Ratiu, §4.3.

Why the sign is negative

With the convention that inclusion Oαg\mathcal O_\alpha\hookrightarrow\mathfrak g^* is the moment map for the positive KKS form, the moment map on the oppositely symplectic orbit is ξ-\xi. Moment maps add under products, giving μ~(m,ξ)=μ(m)ξ\widetilde\mu(m,\xi)=\mu(m)-\xi. Consequently the zero equation is the desired equality μ(m)=ξ\mu(m)=\xi.

Changing the convention for the KKS form or for changes the displayed signs together. The invariant content is that the orbit factor is taken with the symplectic sign that makes the product moment map vanish exactly over μ1(Oα)\mu^{-1}(\mathcal O_\alpha).

Uses and scope

The construction allows zero-level results, including theorems, to be applied at arbitrary coadjoint values. It also makes the coadjoint orbit itself part of the geometry instead of treating α\alpha as a fixed parameter.

The shifting trick does not repair a failure of regularity or properness. If the original reduction is singular, the shifted zero-level reduction is singular as well, though the identification remains useful at the level of stratified quotients.

References
  1. Victor Guillemin and Shlomo Sternberg, Symplectic Techniques in Physics, Cambridge University Press, 1984. DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 5, reduction at coadjoint orbits and the shifting construction.
  2. Juan-Pablo Ortega and Tudor S. Ratiu, Momentum Maps and Hamiltonian Reduction, Birkhäuser, 2004. DOI record. Relevant: §4.3, equivalence of point, orbit, and shifted zero-level reduction.