Definition

Let (V,ωV)(V,\omega_V) and (W,ωW)(W,\omega_W) be finite-dimensional . A linear symplectomorphism is a bijective T:VWT:V\to W; explicitly,

ωW(Tv,Tv)=ωV(v,v)for all v,vV.\omega_W(Tv,Tv')=\omega_V(v,v') \quad\text{for all }v,v'\in V.

Its inverse is automatically symplectic. When V=WV=W and ωV=ωW=ω\omega_V=\omega_W=\omega, linear symplectomorphisms are the automorphisms of the pair (V,ω)(V,\omega). Equivalently, TT is an isomorphism of carrying the target form exactly to the source form, with no choice of basis involved.

Automorphism group

The automorphisms of (V,ω)(V,\omega) form the Sp(V,ω)\operatorname{Sp}(V,\omega) under composition. After choosing a , this group is represented by matrices satisfying

ATJA=J.A^{\mathsf T}JA=J.

Taking determinants gives (detA)2=1(\det A)^2=1; in fact every real symplectic matrix has determinant 11.

Relation to general symplectic maps

A symplectic linear map between finite-dimensional spaces of equal dimension is automatically a linear symplectomorphism because it is injective. In unequal dimensions a symplectic linear map can exist only from the smaller space to the larger one and need not be onto. Thus “symplectic” and “” should not be conflated when source and target dimensions may differ.

Examples and conventions

Every change from one symplectic basis of VV to another is a linear symplectomorphism. On (R2,dxdy)(\mathbb R^2,dx\wedge dy), rotations and the shear (x,y)(x+y,y)(x,y)\mapsto(x+y,y) are examples, whereas (x,y)(2x,2y)(x,y)\mapsto(2x,2y) is not. In Hamiltonian mechanics, “linear canonical transformation” is a common synonym when the chosen form is the standard phase-space form.

References
  1. Dusa McDuff and Dietmar Salamon, Introduction to Symplectic Topology, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2017. DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 2, linear symplectic geometry.
  2. Victor Guillemin and Shlomo Sternberg, Symplectic Techniques in Physics, Cambridge University Press, 1984. Publisher record. Relevant: Chapter 1, the linear symplectic group.