Definition

A AA is locally reflexive if, whenever EAE\subseteq A^{**} and FAF\subseteq A^* are finite-dimensional and ε>0\varepsilon>0, there is a ϕ:EA\phi:E\to A such that

ϕcb1+ε,f(ϕ(x))=x(f)(xE, fF),\|\phi\|_{\mathrm{cb}}\leq 1+\varepsilon,\qquad f(\phi(x))=x(f)\quad(x\in E,\ f\in F),

and ϕ(x)=x\phi(x)=x for xEAx\in E\cap A. Here cb\|\cdot\|_{\mathrm{cb}} is the . The property says that finite-dimensional operator-space data in the bidual can be realized almost isometrically in AA, while matching any prescribed finite collection of dual pairings. No global bounded projection from AA^{**} onto AA is asserted by this definition.

Approximation formulation

Equivalently, for each finite-dimensional EAE\subseteq A^{**}, the inclusion EAE\hookrightarrow A^{**} is a point weak-star limit of maps EAE\to A whose completely bounded norms tend to 11, with the maps fixing EAE\cap A. Passing between this net formulation and the finite set FAF\subseteq A^* formulation is a finite-dimensional separation argument. The matrix norm is essential: ordinary Banach-space local reflexivity holds for every , while operator-space local reflexivity is a genuine restriction.

Relation to exactness

Every is locally reflexive. In particular, nuclear CC^*-algebras are locally reflexive. Local reflexivity is nevertheless weaker than exactness; it controls finite-dimensional approximation from the bidual rather than the behavior of all under minimal tensor product Brown–Ozawa, §9.2.

One tensorial formulation says that the natural comparison maps involving finite-dimensional operator spaces and AA^{**} preserve the minimal operator-space norm. Such formulations make local reflexivity useful in passing approximation and lifting arguments between AA, its representations, and its weak closures.

Conventions

Some sources define local reflexivity for an arbitrary operator space XX and then apply that definition to the canonical operator-space structure of a CC^*-algebra. The interpolation requirement ϕEA=id\phi|_{E\cap A}=\operatorname{id} may be omitted from an equivalent version; it can be restored without changing the property.

References
  1. Edward G. Effros and Uffe Haagerup, “Lifting problems and local reflexivity for CC^*-algebras,” Duke Mathematical Journal 52 (1985), 103–128. Project Euclid DOI record. Relevant: local reflexivity and its relation to lifting and tensor products.
  2. Nathanial P. Brown and Narutaka Ozawa, CC^*-Algebras and Finite-Dimensional Approximations, Graduate Studies in Mathematics 88, American Mathematical Society, 2008. AMS DOI record. Relevant: §9.2 on local reflexivity and exact CC^*-algebras.