Let B⊆AB\subseteq A be a . It is hereditary if, whenever a∈Aa\in A and b∈Bb\in B are satisfying

0≤a≤b,0\leq a\leq b,

then a∈Ba\in B. Thus BB is downward closed inside the positive cone of the ambient algebra AA. Heredity depends on the specified inclusion B⊆AB\subseteq A, not only on the abstract isomorphism type of BB. Every is hereditary, but a hereditary subalgebra need not absorb multiplication by arbitrary elements of AA.

Equivalent characterizations

For a C∗C^*-subalgebra B⊆AB\subseteq A, the following are equivalent:

  1. BB is hereditary;
  2. BAB⊆BBAB\subseteq B; and
  3. b∗ab∈Bb^*ab\in B for every a∈Aa\in A and b∈Bb\in B.

These formulations connect order in the positive cone with algebraic compression. They also show that bAb‾\overline{bAb} is a hereditary C∗C^*-subalgebra whenever b∈A+b\in A_+.

Corners and generated hereditary subalgebras

If pp is a in AA, the corner

pAp={pap:a∈A}pAp=\{pap:a\in A\}

is hereditary. More generally, for S⊆A+S\subseteq A_+, the hereditary subalgebra generated by SS is the smallest hereditary C∗C^*-subalgebra containing SS; for a single positive element hh, it is hAh‾\overline{hAh}. Functional calculus gives the same subalgebra as the closure of h1/2Ah1/2h^{1/2}Ah^{1/2}.

Hereditary subalgebras correspond, in the bidual A∗∗A^{**}, to open projections. This correspondence is a principal reason they are useful for support, Morita equivalence, and the internal geometry of ideals.

Examples and distinctions

Every I◃AI\triangleleft A is hereditary. The corner pMn(C)ppM_n(\mathbb C)p is hereditary in Mn(C)M_n(\mathbb C), but for a noncentral projection pp it is not an ideal. This demonstrates that heredity is strictly weaker than the two-sided absorption property.

The scalar subalgebra C1⊆Mn(C)\mathbb C1\subseteq M_n(\mathbb C), for n>1n>1, is not hereditary: a nontrivial projection qq satisfies 0≤q≤10\leq q\leq1, yet q∉C1q\notin\mathbb C1. Hence being unital, closed, or stable under functional calculus does not by itself imply heredity in the ambient algebra.

References
  1. Gert K. Pedersen, C-Algebras and Their Automorphism Groups, 2nd ed., Academic Press, 2018. DOI record. Relevant: §1.5 on hereditary C∗C^*-subalgebras and positive order.
  2. Bruce Blackadar, Operator Algebras: Theory of C-Algebras and von Neumann Algebras*, Springer, 2006. DOI record. Relevant: §II.3 on hereditary subalgebras, open projections, and corners.