Let π:P→M\pi:P\to M be a with structure GG, and let H⊆GH\subseteq G be a Lie subgroup.

The following are equivalent:

  1. (Existence of an HH-reduction) There exists a principal HH-bundle PH→MP_H\to M and an HH-equivariant embedding PH↪PP_H\hookrightarrow P over MM such that PP is obtained from PHP_H by extension of along the inclusion H↪GH\hookrightarrow G.
  1. (HH-valued transition functions) There exists an open cover {Ui}\{U_i\} and local trivializations P∣Ui≅Ui×GP|_{U_i}\cong U_i\times G for which the transition functions gij:Uij→Gg_{ij}:U_{ij}\to G take values in HH.

Moreover, if (2) holds, an explicit HH-reduction is produced by .

Examples
  1. Orientation reduction. The frame bundle of a rank-nn real vector bundle reduces from GL(n,R)\mathrm{GL}(n,\mathbb R) to GL+(n,R)\mathrm{GL}^+(n,\mathbb R) exactly when one can choose transition maps with positive determinant, i.e. when the bundle is orientable.
  1. Metric reduction. Choosing a fiber metric on a vector bundle allows transition functions between orthonormal frames to land in O(n)\mathrm{O}(n), giving an O(n)\mathrm{O}(n)-reduction of the frame bundle.
  1. Unitary reduction. A Hermitian structure on a complex rank-nn bundle yields transition maps valued in U(n)U(n); equivalently, the GL(n,C)\mathrm{GL}(n,\mathbb C) frame bundle reduces to U(n)U(n).