For a g↦Tgg\mapsto T_g, its Koopman representation is

κ:G⟶U(L2(X,μ)),(κ(g)f)(x)=f(Tg−1x).\kappa:G\longrightarrow\mathcal U(L^2(X,\mu)),\qquad (\kappa(g)f)(x)=f(T_{g^{-1}}x).

It satisfies κ(e)=I\kappa(e)=I, κ(gh)=κ(g)κ(h)\kappa(gh)=\kappa(g)\kappa(h), and each κ(g)\kappa(g) is unitary. For topological groups we explicitly assume when invoking results that require it.

Why the inverse is present

Applying two pullbacks yields

κ(g)κ(h)f=f∘Th−1∘Tg−1=f∘T(gh)−1.\kappa(g)\kappa(h)f =f\circ T_{h^{-1}}\circ T_{g^{-1}} =f\circ T_{(gh)^{-1}}.

The norm identity is ∥f∘Tg−1∥2=∥f∥2\|f\circ T_{g^{-1}}\|_2=\|f\|_2, and κ(g−1)\kappa(g^{-1}) is the inverse. This verifies all representation axioms.

What it records

States are points of XX; vectors of the representation are observables. Nonconstant fixed vectors obstruct ergodicity, and matrix coefficients are correlations. The removes the constants that are always fixed; a nonzero finite-dimensional invariant subspace in that reduced representation obstructs weak mixing.

References
  1. Jesse Peterson, Lecture notes on ergodic theory, 2011. §2.2.