Let SS and TT be of a MM. They are transverse at p∈S∩Tp\in S\cap T if

TpS+TpT=TpM.T_pS+T_pT=T_pM.

They are transverse, written S⋔TS\pitchfork T, if this condition holds at every point of S∩TS\cap T. Equivalently, the TpS⊕TpT→TpMT_pS\oplus T_pT\to T_pM, (v,w)↦v−w(v,w)\mapsto v-w, is surjective for each intersection point. Disjoint submanifolds are transverse by convention because there are no intersection points at which the condition can fail.

Transverse intersection theorem

If S⋔TS\pitchfork T, then S∩TS\cap T is an embedded submanifold of MM with

Tp(S∩T)=TpS∩TpTT_p(S\cap T)=T_pS\cap T_pT

and codimension codim⁡(S∩T)=codim⁡S+codim⁡T\operatorname{codim}(S\cap T)=\operatorname{codim}S+\operatorname{codim}T. Equivalently, its dimension is dim⁡S+dim⁡T−dim⁡M\dim S+\dim T-\dim M.

Examples and non-examples

The coordinate axes in R2\mathbb R^2 meet transversely at the origin. The xx-axis and the parabola y=x2y=x^2 do not: at their intersection both are the xx-axis, so their sum does not fill R2\mathbb R^2.

Conventions and scope

Transversality is a condition only along the actual intersection. It is stronger than the set-theoretic statement that the intersection has the expected dimension, and it is distinct from orthogonality: no metric is required.

References
  1. J. M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., Springer, 2012. Springer DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 6, transversality and intersections.
  2. V. Guillemin and A. Pollack, Differential Topology, AMS Chelsea Publishing, 2010 reprint. AMS DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 2, transversality and intersection theory.