Statement

Let a GG act on (M,ω)(M,\omega), and suppose the action is with equivariant μ:M→g∗\mu:M\to\mathfrak g^*. Fix α∈g∗\alpha\in\mathfrak g^*. If α\alpha is a and its coadjoint stabilizer GαG_\alpha acts freely and properly on μ−1(α)\mu^{-1}(\alpha), then the

M/ ⁣/ ⁣αG=μ−1(α)/GαM/\!/\!_\alpha G=\mu^{-1}(\alpha)/G_\alpha

is a . It carries a unique symplectic form ωα\omega_\alpha characterized by

π∗ωα=i∗ω,\pi^*\omega_\alpha=i^*\omega,

where ii is inclusion and π\pi is the orbit projection. Its dimension is dim⁡M−dim⁡G−dim⁡Gα\dim M-\dim G-\dim G_\alpha.

Why the stabilizer acts

Equivariance gives μ(g⋅m)=Ad⁡g∗μ(m)\mu(g\cdot m)=\operatorname{Ad}_g^*\mu(m). Therefore gg preserves the individual level μ−1(α)\mu^{-1}(\alpha) exactly when g∈Gαg\in G_\alpha; the full group usually moves this level through the family μ−1(Ad⁡g∗α)\mu^{-1}(\operatorname{Ad}_g^*\alpha). This is why quotienting μ−1(α)\mu^{-1}(\alpha) by all of GG is generally undefined.

For m∈μ−1(α)m\in\mu^{-1}(\alpha), the kernel of i∗ωi^*\omega equals the to the GαG_\alpha-orbit. Thus the restricted form is basic for the free and descends to a nondegenerate two-form. Closedness descends from dω=0d\omega=0.

Dimension and special cases

Regularity makes μ−1(α)\mu^{-1}(\alpha) have codimension dim⁡G\dim G. Quotienting by the free GαG_\alpha-action removes another dim⁡Gα\dim G_\alpha dimensions, giving the formula in the core. If α\alpha is fixed by the coadjoint action, then Gα=GG_\alpha=G and

dim⁡(M/ ⁣/ ⁣αG)=dim⁡M−2dim⁡G,\dim(M/\!/\!_\alpha G)=\dim M-2\dim G,

the familiar zero-level count.

For an every coadjoint value is fixed, so nonzero levels are reduced by the full group. For a nonabelian group, GαG_\alpha can be strictly smaller, and the dimension formula reflects that difference.

Relation to zero-level reduction

The converts reduction at α\alpha into zero-level reduction of MM times the through α\alpha equipped with the opposite . This also identifies μ−1(α)/Gα\mu^{-1}(\alpha)/G_\alpha with μ−1(Oα)/G\mu^{-1}(\mathcal O_\alpha)/G under the corresponding regularity hypotheses.

References
  1. Juan-Pablo Ortega and Tudor S. Ratiu, Momentum Maps and Hamiltonian Reduction, Birkhäuser, 2004. DOI record. Relevant: §4.3, point reduction at a coadjoint value.
  2. Jerrold E. Marsden and Tudor S. Ratiu, Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry, 2nd ed., Springer, 1999. DOI record. Relevant: §10.3, regular point and orbit reduction.