Let VV be a finite-dimensional real , let L0L_0 be a fixed , and let L(t)L(t) be a smooth path of Lagrangian subspaces. If t0t_0 is a crossing, meaning L(t0)L0{0}L(t_0)\cap L_0\ne\{0\}, choose a Lagrangian complement L1L_1 of L(t0)L(t_0) and write nearby L(t)L(t) as the graph of A(t):L(t0)L1A(t):L(t_0)\to L_1, using ω\omega to identify L1L_1 with L(t0)L(t_0)^*. Its crossing form is the quadratic form

Γ(L,L0,t0)(v)=ω(v,A˙(t0)v),vL(t0)L0.\Gamma(L,L_0,t_0)(v)=\omega\bigl(v,\dot A(t_0)v\bigr),\qquad v\in L(t_0)\cap L_0.
Graph formula

This is the Robbin–Salamon convention for the graph chart; the resulting form is independent of the complement after the same symplectic identification is used.

The graph description in the core is local: the derivative A˙(t0)\dot A(t_0) is symmetric under the identification induced by ω\omega, so its restriction to the crossing subspace is a well-defined quadratic form.

Regular crossings and index contributions

The crossing is regular when Γ(L,L0,t0)\Gamma(L,L_0,t_0) is nondegenerate. A regular crossing is isolated, and its local signed contribution to the Maslov index is the signature signΓ(L,L0,t0)\operatorname{sign}\Gamma(L,L_0,t_0). Endpoint crossings require an endpoint convention; the Robbin–Salamon convention assigns half the signature at each regular endpoint.

References
  1. Joel Robbin and Dietmar Salamon, “The Maslov index for paths,” Topology 32 (1993), 827–844. DOI record. Relevant: §2, crossing forms and regular crossings.
  2. Viktor I. Arnol'd, “On a characteristic class entering into conditions of quantization,” Functional Analysis and Its Applications 1 (1967), 1–14. DOI record. Relevant: the Maslov cycle and its coorientation.