Theorem
Relations among harmonic and plurisubharmonic functions
The inclusion and intersection relations among H, SH, PSH, and PH on a complex domain.
Statement
On a domain , let , , , and denote the harmonic, subharmonic, plurisubharmonic, and pluriharmonic functions, respectively. Then
Equivalently, inside , the classes and overlap exactly in . When , and .
Diagram
The set-theoretic picture for is
Neither nor holds in general.
Why the intersection is pluriharmonic
For a smooth function, means that the Levi matrix is positive semidefinite, while harmonicity says that its trace is zero because
A positive-semidefinite Hermitian matrix with zero trace is zero. Hence a harmonic PSH function has vanishing Levi form and is pluriharmonic. The same conclusion holds without smoothness by distributional regularity.
For the inclusions, a harmonic function has zero real Laplacian and hence is subharmonic on the underlying real domain, giving . A plurisubharmonic function is subharmonic on that real domain because its Levi matrix is positive semidefinite and four times its trace is the real Laplacian, giving . (Restricting a real-harmonic function to an arbitrary complex line would not, by itself, prove the first inclusion.) Vanishing Levi form is locally equivalent to for holomorphic , which is pluriharmonic; mollification gives the distributional version. In one complex dimension four times the Levi trace is the planar Laplacian, so the classes collapse as stated.
Separating examples
On , the function is PSH but not harmonic. For , the function is harmonic but not PSH. These examples expose the distinction: subharmonicity controls the trace of the complex Hessian, whereas plurisubharmonicity controls the whole Hermitian matrix.
References
- Lars Hörmander, Notions of Convexity, Birkhäuser, 2007. DOI record. Relevant: Chapter 2.
- Marek Klimek, Pluripotential Theory, Oxford University Press, 1991. Publisher record.