Let HH be a complex linear whose identity component HH^\circ is reductive. A sHs\in H normalizes some of HH^\circ. Since maximal tori of HH^\circ are HH^\circ-conjugate, after conjugation one may place ss in the

NH(T)N_H(T)

of a fixed maximal torus THT\subset H^\circ.

Based data

A representative in NH(T)N_H(T) induces an automorphism of the . Composing with a Weyl-group element can arrange preservation of a chosen positive system when the induced component admits such a representative. This is a statement about a component and its , not the ordinary assertion that every semisimple element of a connected group lies in TT.

Connected special case

If HH is connected reductive, every semisimple element is conjugate into TT itself. Its ordinary is then a Weyl orbit in TT.

Langlands role

This is the normalizer-representative principle used in the letter for a disconnected group such as Γ\rtimes\Gamma. In an , an lies in a coset G^Frob\widehat G\rtimes\operatorname{Frob}. Conjugacy inside that coset is a . A torus-normalizer representative makes the root-theoretic Satake description possible, but modern formulations use the invariant quotient of the Frobenius fiber rather than treating the coset as a connected .

Attribution warning

The source letter invokes Borel–Mostow in a specific disconnected algebraic-group setting. Variants in the literature have different hypotheses on the component group and on semisimplicity. The connected special case above is unconditional; any stronger “dominant representative” assertion should be cited with its exact version.

References
  1. A. Borel and G. D. Mostow, “On semi-simple automorphisms of Lie algebras,” Annals of Mathematics 61 (1955), 389–405. DOI.
  2. T. A. Springer, Linear Algebraic Groups, second edition, Birkhäuser, 1998, §§7–8.