Localization preserves prime ideals
A prime ideal disjoint from the multiplicative set extends to a prime ideal in the localized ring.
Prime ideals behave well under localization: if a prime ideal does not meet the elements being inverted, then it stays prime after localization. This is one half of the prime correspondence under localization.
Let be a commutative ring, let be a multiplicative set in , and let be a prime ideal of such that .
Then the extended ideal
is a prime ideal of .
Moreover, is precisely the kernel of the canonical map
and contracting back recovers :
If , then (so there is no corresponding prime in the localization), which explains the disjointness hypothesis.
Examples
- Localizing at a prime. Let and , so . The prime ideals of are and for primes . One checks:
- , so extends to the (unique) maximal ideal , which is prime.
- If , then (since ), so becomes the unit ideal after localization.
- Also , so extends to in .
- Inverting a variable in a polynomial ring. Let and , so . The ideal is prime and disjoint from (since no power of lies in ), hence is prime in . By contrast, the prime ideal meets (it contains ), so .
- Localization at a prime and the resulting local ring. If is a prime ideal of and , then is the localization , which is a local ring. The extension becomes the unique maximal ideal of , and it is prime by the theorem.
For the full bijective correspondence between primes of and primes of disjoint from , see the localization prime correspondence.