Gibbs–Duhem Relation

Extensivity implies a differential constraint among intensive variables, so they are not all independent.
Gibbs–Duhem Relation

Definition and physical interpretation

For a single-phase extensive , the intensive variables are constrained by the Gibbs–Duhem relation. For a simple, single-component system with variables (S,V,N)(S,V,N), it reads

SdTVdP+Ndμ=0, S\,dT - V\,dP + N\,d\mu = 0,

where TT is the , PP the , and μ\mu the ; SS, VV, and NN are the corresponding variables.

More generally, for multiple species with particle numbers NiN_i and chemical potentials μi\mu_i,

SdTVdP+iNidμi=0. S\,dT - V\,dP + \sum_i N_i\,d\mu_i = 0.

Physically, this expresses that intensities cannot vary independently once the system is extensive: the freedom to scale the system size (doubling (S,V,Ni)(S,V,N_i)) does not introduce an independent way to scale the conjugate intensities. For a one-component system, it implies that specifying (T,P)(T,P) fixes μ\mu (up to phase coexistence subtleties).

How it arises

Starting from the for the U(S,V,N)U(S,V,N),

U=TSPV+μN, U = TS - PV + \mu N,

differentiate and compare with the exact differential from the

dU=TdSPdV+μdN. dU = T\,dS - P\,dV + \mu\,dN.

The difference between these two expressions eliminates dUdU, dSdS, dVdV, and dNdN and leaves the Gibbs–Duhem constraint.

Useful rearrangements

  • Dividing by NN introduces s=S/Ns=S/N and v=V/Nv=V/N:

    dμ=vdPsdT. d\mu = v\,dP - s\,dT.

    This makes explicit that for a one-component phase, μ\mu is a function of (T,P)(T,P).

  • Using with G=μNG=\mu N (from Euler’s relation for a simple system) gives the same constraint by comparing

    dG=SdT+VdP+μdN dG = -S\,dT + V\,dP + \mu\,dN

    with d(μN)=μdN+Ndμd(\mu N)=\mu\,dN+N\,d\mu.