Entropy maximization implies equality of chemical potential
For two weakly coupled subsystems exchanging particles at fixed totals, the entropy maximum implies equality of the chemical potentials (in thermal equilibrium).
Entropy maximization implies equality of chemical potential
Statement (chemical potential equality from entropy maximization)
Let subsystems 1 and 2 be able to exchange particles of a given species through a permeable interface. Let be the entropy of subsystem , where is the particle number of that species.
Assume:
the composite is isolated with fixed totals , , and ,
the subsystems are weakly interacting so entropy is additive:
are differentiable in , and equilibrium corresponds to an interior maximizer of .
Then entropy maximization implies
Using the thermodynamic identity (definition of chemical potential )
one obtains the equilibrium condition
In particular, if the subsystems are also in thermal equilibrium (so that temperatures are equal ), then
Key hypotheses
- Particle exchange is allowed; total particle number is fixed.
- Weak coupling so entropy is additive.
- Differentiability of in and an interior entropy maximizer.
- (For the conclusion ) thermal equilibrium, i.e., .
Key conclusions
The entropy maximum enforces equality of :
With temperature equalization (), chemical potentials equalize:
Cross-links to relevant definitions
- Chemical potential and temperature: chemical potential , temperature .
- Entropy and equilibrium: thermodynamic entropy , thermodynamic equilibrium .
- Internal energy: internal energy .
- Stability conditions: thermodynamic stability .