Entropy maximization implies equality of chemical potential
Statement (chemical potential equality from entropy maximization)
Let subsystems 1 and 2 be able to exchange particles of a given species through a permeable interface. Let be the entropy of subsystem , where is the particle number of that species.
Assume:
the composite is isolated with fixed totals , , and ,
the subsystems are weakly interacting so entropy is additive:
are differentiable in , and equilibrium corresponds to an interior maximizer of .
Then entropy maximization implies
Using the thermodynamic identity (definition of chemical potential )
one obtains the equilibrium condition
In particular, if the subsystems are also in thermal equilibrium (so that temperatures are equal ), then
Key hypotheses
- Particle exchange is allowed; total particle number is fixed.
- Weak coupling so entropy is additive.
- Differentiability of in and an interior entropy maximizer.
- (For the conclusion ) thermal equilibrium, i.e., .
Key conclusions
The entropy maximum enforces equality of :
With temperature equalization (), chemical potentials equalize:
Cross-links to relevant definitions
- Chemical potential and temperature: chemical potential , temperature .
- Entropy and equilibrium: thermodynamic entropy , thermodynamic equilibrium .
- Internal energy: internal energy .
- Stability conditions: thermodynamic stability .
Proof idea / significance (sketch)
Maximize with respect to subject to . Stationarity gives equality of the derivatives across subsystems, which equals . Hence , and with thermal equilibrium this reduces to . This is the thermodynamic basis for chemical potential as the intensive variable that equalizes under diffusive contact.