Griffiths monotonicity lemma

For ferromagnetic Ising-type models, spin correlations are monotone nondecreasing in the couplings and external fields; used to construct infinite-volume limits and compare boundary conditions.
Griffiths monotonicity lemma

Statement (monotonicity in parameters)

Consider the ferromagnetic Ising model on a finite graph/finite region Λ\Lambda with spins σx{1,+1}\sigma_x\in\{-1,+1\} and Hamiltonian

H(σ)={x,y}Jxyσxσy    xhxσx, H(\sigma)= -\sum_{\{x,y\}} J_{xy}\,\sigma_x\sigma_y \;-\; \sum_x h_x\,\sigma_x,

with ferromagnetic couplings Jxy0J_{xy}\ge 0 and nonnegative external field hx0h_x\ge 0 (and any fixed boundary condition, typically plus).

Let J,h\langle \cdot \rangle_{J,h} denote expectation with respect to the associated .

For any finite set AΛA\subset \Lambda, define the spin product σA:=xAσx\sigma_A := \prod_{x\in A}\sigma_x. Then:

  • For every edge {x,y}\{x,y\},

    JxyσAJ,h0. \frac{\partial}{\partial J_{xy}} \langle \sigma_A \rangle_{J,h} \ge 0.
  • For every site xx,

    hxσAJ,h0. \frac{\partial}{\partial h_x} \langle \sigma_A \rangle_{J,h} \ge 0.

Equivalently, all correlation functions σAJ,h\langle \sigma_A\rangle_{J,h} are nondecreasing functions of each coupling JxyJ_{xy} and each field hxh_x in the ferromagnetic, h0h\ge 0 regime.

Key hypotheses

  • The model is ferromagnetic: Jxy0J_{xy}\ge 0 for all interacting pairs.
  • External field is nonnegative: hx0h_x\ge 0 (a common hypothesis ensuring the relevant correlation inequalities hold in the strongest form).
  • Differentiability of finite-volume expectations in the parameters (automatic for finite systems).

Key conclusions

  • Monotonicity of magnetization mx=σxm_x=\langle \sigma_x\rangle and higher correlations with respect to strengthening couplings/fields.
  • Useful monotone limits as volume grows (e.g., with plus boundary conditions), supporting construction of by monotone convergence.
  • Parameter comparison and bounds for observables such as .

Proof idea (sketch)

Differentiate the expectation in the parameter. For example,

hxσAJ,h=σAσxJ,hσAJ,hσxJ,h=CovJ,h(σA,σx). \frac{\partial}{\partial h_x}\langle \sigma_A\rangle_{J,h} ={} \langle \sigma_A \sigma_x\rangle_{J,h} - \langle \sigma_A\rangle_{J,h}\langle \sigma_x\rangle_{J,h} ={} \operatorname{Cov}_{J,h}(\sigma_A,\sigma_x).

Similarly, $$ \frac{\partial}{\partial J_{xy}}\langle \sigma_A\rangle_{J,h}

={} \operatorname{Cov}_{J,h}(\sigma_A,\sigma_x\sigma_y). $$

In the ferromagnetic regime with h0h\ge 0, Griffiths/GKS/FKG-type inequalities imply the relevant covariances are nonnegative, giving the stated monotonicity.